Replace publisher URLs with doi.org equivalents (313)

[LukasWallrich]

Summary

Many references in `content/` pointed at publisher pages (SAGE, ScienceDirect, Wiley, Springer, Royal Society, OUP, JSTOR, psycnet, etc.) instead of `https://doi.org/{DOI}\`. Publishers bot-block automated checks, so those links were producing unhelpful "broken" reports in the link checker even though the underlying papers are fine.

This PR converts 313 publisher URLs to their `doi.org` form, in two passes. Every replacement DOI was verified against the DOI Handle API before being applied — nothing was changed without confirming the new link resolves.

Pass 1 — DOI visible in URL (207)

Regex-extract from the URL itself, then verify.

count	source pattern
161	`sciencedirect.com/science/article/[abs/]?pii/` (PII → DOI via Crossref `alternative-id` filter)
33	`psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=...` (DOI lifted from query string)
6	`royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/...`
3	`link.springer.com/article|chapter|...`
2	`journals.sagepub.com/doi/...`
1	`onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/...`
1	`tandfonline.com/doi/...`

Pass 2 — DOI looked up from URL ID (106)

Extract the publisher's record/article/stable ID, look it up via Crossref's `alternative-id` filter, fall back to OpenAlex bibliographic search for JSTOR/OUP. Verify via Handle API.

count	source pattern
57	`psycnet.apa.org/{record,buy}/` (Crossref alt-id)
22	`sciencedirect.com/.../pii/` — prior rate-limit misses retried
14	`academic.oup.com//article-abstract/.../` (mostly OpenAlex)
10	`jstor.org/stable/` (OpenAlex)
3	`psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/.html`

Not addressed (~72 URLs left)

• ~27 psycnet record/fulltext that neither Crossref nor OpenAlex indexes (likely book chapters, dissertations, or non-journal records).
• ~23 ScienceDirect PIIs that neither service recognises (conference proceedings, supplements).
• 7 JSTOR stable IDs that don't map to `10.2307/` (older content predating DOI deposit).
• 7 `journals.lww.com/...` (lww IDs aren't indexed in Crossref or OpenAlex).
• A handful of others.

These need per-URL human verification — likely "the original article never had a DOI deposited" rather than a fixable typo.

Test plan

• Spot-check a couple of converted DOIs in the rendered site (do they go to the right paper?)
• Re-run the Link Checker workflow after merging both this PR and Link Checker: rolling issue + Crossref DOI validation #757; the "Publisher URLs that should use doi.org" section should be ~313 entries shorter.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[github-actions]

👍 All image files/references (if any) are in webp format, in line with our policy.

[github-actions]

📝 Spell Check Results

Found 1 potential spelling issue(s) when checking 10 changed file(s):

📄 content/educators-corner/004-Teaching-why-how-replication/index.md

Line	Issue
94	pre-selected ==> preselected

---

ℹ️ How to address these issues:

1. Fix the typo: If it's a genuine typo, please correct it.
2. Add to whitelist: If it's a valid word (e.g., a name, technical term), add it to .codespell-ignore.txt
3. False positive: If this is a false positive, please report it in the PR comments.

_{🤖 This check was performed by codespell}

[LukasWallrich]

✅ Staging Deployment Status

This PR has been successfully deployed to staging as part of an aggregated deployment.

Deployed at: 2026-05-07 19:13:54 UTC
Staging URL: https://staging.forrt.org

The staging site shows the combined state of all compatible open PRs.

[richarddushime]

LGTM 👍