Summary
DataExtract::FixedWidth 0.09 fails two upstream tests under PerlOnJava because a state variable declared inside a file-reading loop does not retain the constructed object between iterations. The first iteration should initialize $fw; on the next iteration $fw is undefined and the test dies calling parse.
Reproduction
This was found in CPAN random run 20260921-124328-13959 at PerlOnJava commit d8e4fd417.
The affected upstream tests are:
t/03-Nulls.t
t/04-Fix-Overlay.t
Both tests have the same relevant structure:
while (my $line = <$fh>) {
state $fw;
if ($. == 1) {
$fw = DataExtract::FixedWidth->new({
header_row => $line,
null_as_undef => 1, # or fix_overlay => 1
});
}
else {
my $arr_ref = $fw->parse($line);
}
}
Under PerlOnJava, the constructor branch runs for the first line, but $fw is undefined on the second line. The test then dies with:
Can't call method "parse" on an undefined value
The failure reproduces when running the actual test files with both the JVM backend and the interpreter backend. It is not a timeout or a dependency-installation failure.
Expected behavior
state $fw should retain its value for subsequent loop iterations, as it does under standard Perl. The first line should construct a DataExtract::FixedWidth object and later lines should call parse on that same object.
Results
Standard Perl passes the focused tests:
t/03-Nulls.t ........ ok
t/04-Fix-Overlay.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=2, Tests=15
The archived standard-Perl oracle also passes the complete distribution suite: 18 test files, 82 tests.
PerlOnJava fails:
t/03-Nulls.t exited 255; planned 12 tests, ran 0
t/04-Fix-Overlay.t exited 255; planned 3 tests, ran 0
Files=18, Tests=68
Failed 2/18 test programs
The remaining 16 test programs pass. The test files are reproducible on both PerlOnJava execution backends.
Suspected area
The immediate failure surface is lowering or runtime handling of file-scoped state variables in this loop context. The interaction with Perl's $. input-line counter is also worth checking: the initialization branch is selected using $. == 1, and PerlOnJava may be handling the line counter or its association with the newly opened filehandle differently in the failing source-file context.
A simple scalar state loop can appear to work in a minimal -e invocation, so the regression test should preserve the source-file form, filehandle read loop, $. == 1 branch, and object assignment shown above.
Environment and scope
- Distribution:
DataExtract::FixedWidth 0.09
- PerlOnJava backends: JVM and interpreter
- Standard Perl oracle: Perl 5.42.2 on macOS
- Native/XS code: none
- Reverse-dependency analysis: not applicable; this is a pure-Perl distribution
This is an upstream compatibility failure, not a failure caused by missing services, display requirements, native libraries, or unsupported XS code.
Summary
DataExtract::FixedWidth0.09 fails two upstream tests under PerlOnJava because astatevariable declared inside a file-reading loop does not retain the constructed object between iterations. The first iteration should initialize$fw; on the next iteration$fwis undefined and the test dies callingparse.Reproduction
This was found in CPAN random run
20260921-124328-13959at PerlOnJava commitd8e4fd417.The affected upstream tests are:
t/03-Nulls.tt/04-Fix-Overlay.tBoth tests have the same relevant structure:
Under PerlOnJava, the constructor branch runs for the first line, but
$fwis undefined on the second line. The test then dies with:The failure reproduces when running the actual test files with both the JVM backend and the interpreter backend. It is not a timeout or a dependency-installation failure.
Expected behavior
state $fwshould retain its value for subsequent loop iterations, as it does under standard Perl. The first line should construct aDataExtract::FixedWidthobject and later lines should callparseon that same object.Results
Standard Perl passes the focused tests:
The archived standard-Perl oracle also passes the complete distribution suite: 18 test files, 82 tests.
PerlOnJava fails:
The remaining 16 test programs pass. The test files are reproducible on both PerlOnJava execution backends.
Suspected area
The immediate failure surface is lowering or runtime handling of file-scoped
statevariables in this loop context. The interaction with Perl's$.input-line counter is also worth checking: the initialization branch is selected using$. == 1, and PerlOnJava may be handling the line counter or its association with the newly opened filehandle differently in the failing source-file context.A simple scalar
stateloop can appear to work in a minimal-einvocation, so the regression test should preserve the source-file form, filehandle read loop,$. == 1branch, and object assignment shown above.Environment and scope
DataExtract::FixedWidth0.09This is an upstream compatibility failure, not a failure caused by missing services, display requirements, native libraries, or unsupported XS code.