Skip to content

tls: allow multiple TLS certificates in the upstream when using a custom TLS certificate selector - #46479

Open
Berro321 wants to merge 8 commits into
envoyproxy:mainfrom
Berro321:multiple-tls-certs
Open

tls: allow multiple TLS certificates in the upstream when using a custom TLS certificate selector#46479
Berro321 wants to merge 8 commits into
envoyproxy:mainfrom
Berro321:multiple-tls-certs

Conversation

@Berro321

@Berro321 Berro321 commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Commit Message: Allow multiple TLS certificates in the upstream tls context when using a custom TLS certificate selector. The single cert check is kept if one is not defined.

Additional Description: We are working on an internal TLS certificate selector for UpstreamTLSContext that can select between multiple client certificate. By default only one is allowed, so we need a way to allow multiple once our custom TLS certificate selector is enabled.
Risk Level: Medium
Testing: Added unit tests, tested manually to check it works with our custom cert selector.
Docs Changes: Added documentation in the API proto for tls_certificates to indicate multiple certs are allowed in a client context when a custom TLS certificate selector is used.
Release Notes: Added a release note under new features.
Platform Specific Features: N/A

a custom tls cert selector is used for the
upstream.

Signed-off-by: Berro321 <matchburn321@gmail.com>
@repokitteh-read-only

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi @Berro321, welcome and thank you for your contribution.

We will try to review your Pull Request as quickly as possible.

In the meantime, please take a look at the contribution guidelines if you have not done so already.

🐱

Caused by: #46479 was opened by Berro321.

see: more, trace.

@repokitteh-read-only

Copy link
Copy Markdown

As a reminder, PRs marked as draft will not be automatically assigned reviewers,
or be handled by maintainer-oncall triage.

Please mark your PR as ready when you want it to be reviewed!

🐱

Caused by: #46479 was opened by Berro321.

see: more, trace.

@Berro321
Berro321 had a problem deploying to external-contributors July 31, 2026 05:45 — with GitHub Actions Error
Signed-off-by: Berro321 <matchburn321@gmail.com>
@Berro321
Berro321 had a problem deploying to external-contributors July 31, 2026 20:29 — with GitHub Actions Error
Signed-off-by: Berro321 <matchburn321@gmail.com>
@Berro321
Berro321 temporarily deployed to external-contributors July 31, 2026 20:57 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@Berro321
Berro321 marked this pull request as ready for review July 31, 2026 21:18
@repokitteh-read-only

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CC @envoyproxy/api-shepherds: Your approval is needed for changes made to (api/envoy/|docs/root/api-docs/).
envoyproxy/api-shepherds assignee is @adisuissa
CC @envoyproxy/api-watchers: FYI only for changes made to (api/envoy/|docs/root/api-docs/).

🐱

Caused by: #46479 was ready_for_review by Berro321.

see: more, trace.

@adisuissa adisuissa left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm api

@repokitteh-read-only repokitteh-read-only Bot removed the api label Aug 5, 2026
@adisuissa

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Assigning @botengyao as codeowner
/assign @botengyao

@Berro321
Berro321 temporarily deployed to external-contributors August 5, 2026 22:45 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@Berro321

Berro321 commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/retest

@Berro321
Berro321 had a problem deploying to external-contributors August 7, 2026 20:14 — with GitHub Actions Error
Signed-off-by: Berro321 <matchburn321@gmail.com>
@Berro321
Berro321 deployed to external-contributors August 7, 2026 20:52 — with GitHub Actions Active
@Berro321
Berro321 had a problem deploying to external-contributors August 11, 2026 19:30 — with GitHub Actions Error
@Berro321

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/retest

@Berro321
Berro321 requested a deployment to external-contributors August 12, 2026 17:33 — with GitHub Actions Waiting
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants