Skip to content

Adjust wait for initial dialog contents in QuickAccessDialogTest#4027

Closed
trancexpress wants to merge 1 commit into
eclipse-platform:masterfrom
trancexpress:gh4009
Closed

Adjust wait for initial dialog contents in QuickAccessDialogTest#4027
trancexpress wants to merge 1 commit into
eclipse-platform:masterfrom
trancexpress:gh4009

Conversation

@trancexpress
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adjusted the wait for initial dialog contents in
QuickAccessDialogTest.testPreviousChoicesAvailableForExtension(), to rely on QuickAccessDialog.setInfoText() instead of relying on specific dialog contents set during the test.

See: #4009

@merks
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

merks commented May 25, 2026

@trancexpress

Feel free to merge changes intended to fix/improve flaky tests.

@trancexpress
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Alright, though I have doubts this will help. I still see async code running despite the change, just less of it. The code in the job done listener is proving difficult to wait for... If that is even the cause for the I-build fails. So no rush from my side to merge this.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 25, 2026

Test Results

   864 files  ±0     864 suites  ±0   55m 46s ⏱️ + 4m 4s
 7 988 tests ±0   7 745 ✅ ±0  243 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
20 418 runs  ±0  19 763 ✅ ±0  655 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9b61ca5. ± Comparison against base commit 956129f.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

…g outputs

Adjusted the wait for initial dialog contents in
QuickAccessDialogTest.testPreviousChoicesAvailableForExtension(),
to rely on QuickAccessDialog.setInfoText() instead of relying
on specific dialog contents set during the test.

Additionally debug outputs are added when setting dialog contents,
the debug outputs are enabled for QuickAccessDialogTest.

See: eclipse-platform#4009
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants