compiler: Avoid int32 overflow in linearized host-device transfer size

[gaoflow]

Description

Fixes #2777.

When a host↔device data transfer is linearized, its array section size is emitted as a product of the Function's per-dimension sizes, for example:

#pragma acc enter data copyin(u[0:u_vec->size[0]*u_vec->size[1]*u_vec->size[2]*u_vec->size[3]])

The u_vec->size[i] fields are 32-bit C ints, so the product size[0]*size[1]*size[2]*size[3] is evaluated in 32-bit arithmetic. For a Function with more than ~2**31 elements (e.g. the reporter's 1295**3 ≈ 2.17e9 points, ~24.5 GB) the product overflows int before it is used as the transfer bound, producing a bogus size (the reporter saw 18446744065653020036) and a corrupt / failed device transfer — independent of index-mode=int64/linearize=True, because those control the kernel index type, not the type of the transfer-clause arithmetic.

As @mloubout noted on the issue, the fix is to perform the size multiplication in 64-bit. This casts each factor of a product section bound to a 64-bit integer:

#pragma acc enter data copyin(u[0:(long)(u_vec->size[0])*(long)(u_vec->size[1])*(long)(u_vec->size[2])*(long)(u_vec->size[3])])

Casting the whole product ((long)(a*b*c)) would be too late — the overflow would already have happened in 32-bit — so each factor is cast individually, which forces every multiplication to be 64-bit regardless of operand ordering.

The change lives in PragmaTransfer._generate, so it is scoped to host-device transfer clauses only. Non-product bounds (a single dimension size, an offset, a constant) cannot overflow and are left untouched, addressing the concern that there is "no reason to use long for all of those". Non-transfer expressions (e.g. free-space guards, TMA descriptors) are unaffected.

Reproduction

from devito import Eq, Grid, Operator, TimeFunction

grid = Grid(shape=(4, 5, 6))
u = TimeFunction(name='u', grid=grid)
op = Operator(Eq(u.forward, u + 1), platform='nvidiaX', language='openacc',
              opt=('advanced', {'linearize': True}))
print(op.body.maps[0].ccode.value)

Before:

acc enter data copyin(u[0:u_vec->size[0]*u_vec->size[1]*u_vec->size[2]*u_vec->size[3]])

After:

acc enter data copyin(u[0:(long)(u_vec->size[0])*(long)(u_vec->size[1])*(long)(u_vec->size[2])*(long)(u_vec->size[3])])

Verification

• The fix applies to both backends (openacc copyin/copyout/delete and openmp map(to:/release:)) and to 2D/3D Functions.
• The non-linearized transfer path (separate per-dimension sections [0:s0][0:s1]...) is unchanged — there is no product there, hence no overflow.
• Added TestPassesOptional::test_linearize_transfer_no_overflow asserting each size[i] factor of a linearized transfer is cast to long and that no bare 32-bit product remains.
• Updated the existing test_gpu_openmp.py expectations (test_basic, test_multiple_eqns) whose OpenMP transfers use the flattened product form.
• Host (CPU) operators, including linearize=True, build and run unchanged (no device transfers emitted). flake8 clean on the changed files.

Note: the GPU test modules are skipif(['nodevice']), so the codegen assertions run on the GPU CI runners. They were validated locally by forcing platform='nvidiaX'.

[gaoflow]

Good point — dropped the cast helper and the is_Mul check in 454434b, applying as_long to the section extent directly:

sections = ''.join([f'[{ccode(i)}:{ccode(as_long(j))}]'
                    for i, j in self.sections])

The generated code is unchanged: the start bound i is always 0/an offset (left as-is, can't overflow) and the extent j is the size product that as_long promotes to 64-bit, e.g. (long)(size[3])*(long)(size[2])*.... I left i uncast rather than wrapping both bounds, since the overflow site (#2777) is the extent product.

[gaoflow]

Gentle ping — the review feedback was addressed back in 454434b (dropped the cast helper and the is_Mul check, switched to as_list). The branch is behind main but conflict-free. Happy to do anything further; otherwise this should be ready for another look when you have a moment.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 35.71429% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 79.23%. Comparing base (52dddd9) to head (43311ac).
⚠️ Report is 121 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
tests/test_gpu_common.py	0.00%	9 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2939      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.85%   79.23%   -3.63%     
==========================================
  Files         249      249              
  Lines       52279    52288       +9     
  Branches     4503     4505       +2     
==========================================
- Hits        43318    41431    -1887     
- Misses       8188    10042    +1854     
- Partials      773      815      +42     

Flag	Coverage Δ
pytest-gpu-aomp-amdgpuX	?
pytest-gpu-gcc-	?
pytest-gpu-icx-	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.