content: refresh maintainer funding and sustainability posts, for #661 - #692
Merged
Conversation
|
🌐 Fork Preview for PR #692 https://pr-692.ddev-com-fork-previews.pages.dev This preview updates automatically when you push changes to your fork. |
Member
Author
|
Feel free to push anything you like into this, of course, @stasadev |
Three related posts still read as current but described 2023-2024 realities: lets-fund-stas-maintainer.md: the ask was "fund Stas so he can leave client work" — he left client work and has been full-time since 2024, while the role is only ~80% funded. Reframed around that. Updated to current numbers (~$9,900/month, 83% of the $12,000/month goal), replaced the false "Platform.sh covers Randy's salary" with the Upsun funding and trademark-transfer history, updated Stas' commit count from 211 to 600, refreshed the maintenance examples to PHP 8.5 / Drupal 12 / MariaDB 12.3 LTS / PostgreSQL 18 / Buildx / Podman, rescaled the ask to $2,000/month, and dropped the stale bank-balance figure. introducing-maintainer-stas.md: added a note that Stas has been full-time since 2024, since the post otherwise reads as though he is part-time with a day job. Stas' self-introduction is left as written. expanding-ddev-maintainer-team.md: removed the 2023 dollar figures and maintainer roster and pointed to /sponsor and the current funding post instead, keeping the evergreen sections on what maintainers do. Also corrected "No funding to the DDEV Foundation goes to Randy", which the 2025 Platform.sh change made false. 🤖 Developed with assistance from [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Follow-up to 89a2af4, covering three more places that read as current but described 2025 conditions: upsun-thank-you-new-sponsors-needed.md: this December 2025 appeal projected sponsorship dropping to about 53% of goal in January 2026. Sponsorship actually recovered to about 83%, so the post was telling readers DDEV was half-funded. Added an update note recording that the community filled the gap, and relabeled the /sponsor link, which said "GitHub Sponsors" (see e49a310). sustainability-for-ddev.md: the "Areas to Improve" and "What Comes Next" sections still listed moving past the BDFL model as pending with "a proposal in progress"; that shipped as the Board of Directors in December 2025. Also replaced the June 2025 financial snapshot (and its bank balance) under a "Current Financial Status" heading with pointers to the live figures, so it can't go stale again. about.astro: Stas came aboard part-time in 2023 and went full-time in 2024, not full-time from the start. 🤖 Developed with assistance from [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
rfay
force-pushed
the
20260725_rfay_fund_stas
branch
from
July 25, 2026 23:57
7f09c66 to
3a6f7d3
Compare
|
PR closed. The Cloudflare Pages preview is no longer updated. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cleanup for #661, covering the maintainer-funding cluster of posts. Three of these are checklist items on that issue; the other three are places the same stale claims surfaced during review.
Pages to review
Preview base: https://pr-692.ddev-com-fork-previews.pages.dev/
What was wrong
The central ask in
lets-fund-stas-maintainerhad already been met. The post asked readers to fund Stas so he could leave client work behind. He did, in 2024, and has been full-time since — but the role is only about 80% funded. The post is reframed around that: the community delivered the maintainer, the funding hasn't fully caught up. Also updated:master→main.pkg/nodepsinddev/ddev: PHP 5.6–8.5, Drupal 12 support present, MariaDB 12.3 LTS, PostgreSQL 18, plus Buildx and Podman/rootless as container-churn examples.upsun-thank-you-new-sponsors-neededwas the most misleading page on the site. This December 2025 appeal projected sponsorship dropping to about 53% of goal in January 2026. It recovered to 83% instead, so the live page was telling readers DDEV was half-funded. Added an update note recording that the community filled the gap — a good story that was going untold — and relabeled the/sponsorlink, which still said "GitHub Sponsors" (see e49a310).sustainability-for-ddevstill listed the Board of Directors as pending. Both the "Areas to Improve" and "What Comes Next" sections described moving past the BDFL model as a goal with "a proposal in progress." That shipped in December 2025. Its "Current Financial Status" heading also presented June 2025 figures, including a bank balance, as current; that section now points at the live sources so it can't go stale again.expanding-ddev-maintainer-teamhad the 2023 dollar figures, the $7,000/month goal, "about 50% of the way there," and a maintainer roster listing three people. Those sections are removed in favour of a pointer to/sponsorand the current funding post. The evergreen "What Do Maintainers Do?" and "Why Do We Want More Full-time Paid Maintainers?" sections are kept — five other posts cite this one for that argument, and/sponsordoesn't make it. Also corrected "No funding to the DDEV Foundation goes to Randy," which the 2025 change made false.Notes for the reviewer
open-source-pledge→lets-fund-stas-maintainerlink flagged on Blog review: currency and correctness (remove/improve list) #661 still resolves.2023-review,2025-plans,2025-review, and the newsletters all contain part-time-Stas and maintainer-roster references that are correct as history.introducing-maintainer-stasis untouched. It was accurate in 2023, and per2025-planswe've lost contact with him; a present-tense correction there would mean editorializing about that in a post that isn't about him. His entry in theexpanding-ddev-maintainer-teamroster went away with that whole section rather than being singled out.introducing-maintainer-stasis left in his own words, including the 2023 description of his day job. The update note at the top carries the correction instead.sustainability-for-ddevstill assigns financial reporting, regulatory filings, and marketing to Randy alone.summaryfrontmatter onexpanding-ddev-maintainer-teamchanged, since "how do the finances work?" no longer describes it. That's visible in blog listings and RSS.Verified with
ddev prettier,ddev textlint, and a fullddev npm run build(216 pages); every relative markdown link was confirmed to resolve in the built HTML.🤖 Generated with Claude Code