feat: add Seq.try_find - #274
Open
bhargavandhe wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
bhargavandhe
force-pushed
the
feat/seq-try-find
branch
2 times, most recently
from
August 18, 2026 17:00
f81270c to
46a29ae
Compare
bhargavandhe
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 18, 2026 17:01
bhargavandhe
force-pushed
the
feat/seq-try-find
branch
from
August 18, 2026 17:33
46a29ae to
5c7a68d
Compare
Owner
|
@bhargavandhe Could you please rebase? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Seq.try_findfor first-match lookupSome(None)as distinct fromNothingThis is a focused contribution toward #82 and intentionally does not add the other sequence operations tracked there.
Verification
uv run pytest tests/test_seq.py -k try_finduv run pytest(484 passed)uv run pre-commit run --all-files --show-diff-on-failureuv build