docs: document the searchExplorations MCP tool - #11551
Conversation
|
Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.
💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you. |
|
Claude finished @igorlukanin's task in 1m 18s —— View job Review complete — docs-only change, looks good to merge. 0 high, 0 medium, 3 low (2 inline nits + 1 verification ask)Full reviewTodos
What's correct
Findings (all low severity, posted inline)
Not applicableSecurity, performance, and test-coverage checks don't apply — this is a 7-line documentation change with no code, no build, and no test surface. I did not run the Mintlify dev server (no dependency install in this environment); the table and MDX are syntactically plain and render-safe by inspection. |
|
Claude finished @igorlukanin's task in 1m 11s —— View job Re-review of the updated diff — both prior nits addressed, docs-only, good to merge. 0 high, 0 medium, 1 low (non-blocking)Full reviewTodos
What changed since my last reviewBoth of my earlier inline nits were addressed, and their threads are already resolved:
Verification
Low (non-blocking, no inline comment posted)Minor tension between the table row and the prose: line 261 says the tool "Returns each one's Still unverified from this repoThe MCP server implementation isn't in this repo, so I still can't confirm two load-bearing claims: that the returned field is literally named Not applicableSecurity, performance, and test-coverage checks don't apply — this is a documentation-only change with no code, no build surface, and no tests. I did not run the Mintlify dev server (no dependency install in this environment); the Mintlify preview build linked above is green. |
a671eef to
1a93aab
Compare
Re-review of the synchronized diff — docs-only, all prior nits addressed, good to merge. 0 high, 0 medium, 1 low (non-blocking)Full reviewTodos
Verification
Low (non-blocking, no inline comment posted)Same minor tension I flagged last round: line 262 says the tool "Returns each one's Confirmed claimsThe two claims I couldn't verify from this repo (the field is literally named Not applicableSecurity, performance, and test-coverage checks don't apply — documentation-only change with no code, no build surface, and no tests. I did not run the Mintlify dev server (no dependency install in this environment); the linked Mintlify preview build is green. View job run • |
Re-review of the synchronized diff — docs-only, every prior nit now closed. 0 high, 0 medium, 0 low — good to mergeFull reviewTodos
What changed since the last review
Verification
ThreadsBoth earlier inline threads (missing link reference + row ordering; paragraph concision) are resolved and outdated. Nothing to resolve or re-post; no new inline comments this round. Confirmed claimsThe two claims not verifiable from this repo — the field is literally named Not applicableSecurity, performance, and test-coverage checks don't apply — documentation-only change with no code, no build surface, and no tests. I did not run the Mintlify dev server (no dependency install in this environment); the linked Mintlify preview build is green. View job run • |
094c8f9 to
f330617
Compare
|
Claude finished @igorlukanin's task in 50s —— View job Re-review of the synchronized diff — docs-only, nothing outstanding. 0 high, 0 medium, 0 low — good to mergeFull reviewTodos
What changedThe branch is now three commits ( Verification
ThreadsBoth earlier inline threads (missing link reference + row ordering; paragraph concision) are resolved and outdated. Nothing to resolve or re-post; no new inline comments this round. Confirmed claimsThe two claims not verifiable from this repo — the field is literally named Not applicableSecurity, performance, and test-coverage checks don't apply — documentation-only change with no code, no build surface, and no tests. I did not run the Mintlify dev server (no dependency install in this environment); the linked Mintlify preview build is green. |
f330617 to
98a4a44
Compare
|
Claude finished @igorlukanin's task in 33s —— View job Re-review of the synchronized diff — docs-only, unchanged content since last sign-off. 0 high, 0 medium, 0 low — good to mergeFull reviewTodos
What changedNothing substantive. The branch is the same three commits ( Verification
ThreadsBoth earlier inline threads (missing link reference + row ordering; paragraph concision) are resolved and outdated. Nothing to resolve or re-post; no new inline comments this round. Confirmed claimsThe two claims not verifiable from this repo — the field is literally named Not applicableSecurity, performance, and test-coverage checks don't apply — documentation-only change with no code, no build surface, and no tests. I did not run the Mintlify dev server (no dependency install in this environment); the linked Mintlify preview build is green. |
Summary
searchExplorationsMCP tool, which searches saved queries — explorations and workbook tabs alike — by name and description and returns each one'ssqlQuery, ready to pass torunQuery.Test plan