Skip to content

[DOC-14585][AI] Correct the Disk i/o optimized thread count (release/7.6) - #4167

Draft
TimLFletcher wants to merge 1 commit into
release/7.6from
DOC-14585-release-7.6
Draft

TimLFletcher wants to merge 1 commit into
release/7.6from
DOC-14585-release-7.6

Conversation

@TimLFletcher

@TimLFletcher TimLFletcher commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Companion to #4165 and #4166. This is the branch whose page DOC-14585 actually quotes.

What changed

modules/manage/pages/manage-settings/general-settings.adoc:181, in Data Settings.

-The number of threads allocated is equal to the number of CPU cores for the node.
+The number of threads allocated is equal to twice the number of CPU cores for the node.

The wording here differs from 8.x, so the edit is worded to match this branch rather than copied from #4165.

Open question for the reviewer, specific to this branch

Does the 2x allocation hold for 7.6, or only for 8.x?

@daniel Owen quoted this page, so the report is against 7.6 directly, which is the reason this PR exists. But the ticket does not say whether the behaviour is version-specific, and thread allocation is the kind of thing that changes between generations. If 7.6 really did allocate one thread per core, this PR should be closed and only #4165 and #4166 land.

Answering this needs someone who knows the 7.6 KV behaviour, not just the current behaviour.

The set

PR Branch Line
#4165 release/8.0 224
#4166 release/8.5 224
this release/7.6 181

Verification

PASS[docs-server @ DOC-14585-release-7.6 vs baseline release/7.6]: no new build diagnostics.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…7.6)

Same correction as PR #4165, applied to release/7.6. This is the page and
the wording the ticket actually quotes.

Whether the 2x allocation holds for 7.6 as well as 8.x is not established
by the ticket. See the PR.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant