[pull] master from supabase:master#1097
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…up (#48126) Add `useSiwcQueryParamOptIn`, which flips on the ChatGPT sign-in rollout localStorage flag when `?siwc-enabled=1` is present, and call it from both pages/sign-in.tsx and pages/sign-up.tsx. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **New Features** * Added support for enabling the sign-in experience via `?siwc-enabled=1`, automatically updating the stored opt-in flag on both sign-in and sign-up pages. * **Tests** * Added coverage confirming the stored flag is updated only for `siwc-enabled=1`, and not for missing, non-`1`, `0`, or repeated/array values. * Added assertions that the behavior is triggered consistently when rendering the sign-in and sign-up pages. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Joshen Lim <joshenlimek@gmail.com>
…48037) ## I have read the [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) file. YES ## What kind of change does this PR introduce? Chore / tooling — adds new ESLint rules for `valtio` and `react-hook-form`. ## What is the current behavior? Studio uses `valtio` and `react-hook-form` heavily, but neither library's dedicated ESLint plugin was installed, so their common API pitfalls were only caught at runtime. ## What is the new behavior? Adds `eslint-plugin-valtio` and `eslint-plugin-react-hook-form` (6 rules total) as `warn`, wired into the existing lint ratchet (`scripts/ratchet-rules.json` + baselines) so current violations are grandfathered and only new ones fail CI — no existing code is changed. Since `eslint-plugin-react-hook-form@0.3.1` still calls the removed ESLint 8 `context.getScope()`, it is wrapped with `fixupPluginRules` from `@eslint/compat` so its rules run under flat config / ESLint 9. ## Additional context Baselines captured: `valtio/state-snapshot-rule` (1), `valtio/avoid-this-in-proxy` (1), `react-hook-form/no-use-watch` (77), and the three recommended react-hook-form rules (0 each). <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **Code Quality** * Expanded linting for Valtio state usage, including safer proxy usage and snapshot-related patterns. * Added React Hook Form lint rules to encourage safer form state handling and discourage problematic watch usage. * Updated accessibility lint configuration and improved ESLint reliability by enabling an ESLint 8→9 compatibility shim for affected rules. * **Maintenance** * Updated ESLint rule baselines and ratcheting settings to match newly enabled rules. * Added required ESLint plugins to the Studio linting setup. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Summary - Simplify CPU messaging on the Compute and Disk docs page and in Studio's compute size UI to keep it generic rather than architecture-specific. ## Test plan - [x] Unit tests pass - [x] Typecheck passes - [x] Lint passes <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **Updates** * Simplified compute size labels across the UI by removing cloud-provider architecture details from CPU text. * Standardized CPU descriptions to show core counts and whether resources are shared or dedicated. * Updated the “Compute Size” pricing/specs table in the compute & disk guide to use generic CPU labels while keeping pricing, memory, and database size guidance the same. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
…nt (#48144) <!-- ccr-slack-attribution --> _Requested by **Ivan Vasilov** · [Slack thread](https://supabase.slack.com/archives/C0161K73J1J/p1784639352877839?thread_ts=1784625513.046239&cid=C0161K73J1J)_ ## I have read the [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) file. YES ## What kind of change does this PR introduce? Bug fix. ## What is the current behavior? Running `pnpm --filter=docs run build:guides-markdown` standalone — as `apps/www`'s prebuild does, without first running `build:federated-content` — crashes with `ENOENT ... ai-skills.json` (and the equivalent for `terraform.schema.json`). The `AiSkillsIndex` and `TerraformProviderSchema` markdown-schema handlers `readFileSync` a gitignored, build-time-generated JSON artifact unconditionally. In the full docs build these files exist because `build:federated-content` runs first (via the docs `prebuild`), but in the standalone / www path they do not, so the read throws. These unguarded reads were introduced in #48045 (ai-skills) and #48010 (terraform), which surfaced as the www Vercel build failure. ## What is the new behavior? Both handlers now render an empty section (return an empty string) when the generated artifact is absent, so `build:guides-markdown` succeeds in the standalone / www path. When the artifact IS present (the full docs build, which runs `build:federated-content` first), behavior is byte-for-byte unchanged — the file is parsed and rendered exactly as before. The full docs build is not affected. ## Additional context Implemented with a minimal `existsSync` guard (from the already-imported `node:fs`) in each handler: - `apps/docs/internals/markdown-schema/AiSkillsIndex.ts` - `apps/docs/internals/markdown-schema/TerraformProviderSchema.ts` No changes to any `package.json`, `.gitignore`, or the generators — the fix is confined to the two handlers. --- _Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01RynCtzP874KrpN8CPf7n7n)_ Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The cron job form has no default value for the timeout input. However, if left empty, the zod schema default it to 0 which fails validation. By setting a default value on the input we ensure: - a value is actually provided - validation triggers if users clear the input <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **Bug Fixes** * Cron job forms now use a consistent 1-second timeout default across function and HTTP request types. * Changing the cron job “Type” clears any previously generated snippet and resets the timeout back to the shared default. * Form initialization and reset behavior were improved to prevent stale timeout/snippet state when creating or editing cron jobs. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
…48113) ## I have read the [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) file. YES ## What kind of change does this PR introduce? Studio UI polish for the Vercel deploy-button new-project connect flow (DEPR-616 follow-up). ## What is the current behavior? - Deploy-button project creation still used `VercelIntegrationWindowLayout` (top bar + Docs/Support footer) while install and choose-project already use shared `InterstitialLayout` - The remove-integration note sat as a floating admonition above the form - Advanced / internal-only config sections could show double dividers, and the Oriole radio bottom border could clip inside the collapsible ## What is the new behavior? - Deploy-button new-project uses `InterstitialLayout` with `VercelIntegrationLogo` and `VercelIntegrationFooter`, matching the other Vercel connect surfaces - Regular `/new` project creation is unchanged; Panel chrome is only flattened when `isVercelIntegrationFlow` is set - Removes unused `VercelIntegrationWindowLayout` / `IntegrationWindowLayout` - Fixes Advanced/Internal-only dividers and collapsible border clipping | Before | After | | --- | --- | | <img width="965" height="1107" alt="Supabase" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/99c1225c-c9e5-4fac-bd64-17920403e447" /> | <img width="965" height="1107" alt="Create Vercel Project Supabase" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c42bff96-5f9f-4c8b-8f3c-093e380f90ed" /> | ## Additional context ### Testing With Studio running locally and while signed in: 1. Open `http://localhost:8082/integrations/vercel/<your-org-slug>/deploy-button/new-project` 2. Confirm the interstitial card: Vercel + Supabase logo pair, “Create a new project” title, form fields, and the muted remove-integration footer under the card 3. Confirm there is no old window chrome (no “Marketplace Connector” / “Deploy Button” top bar, no Docs/Support footer) 4. Optionally submit and confirm project creation still works 5. Spot-check `/new` to confirm the normal project creation form is unchanged If you have advanced config enabled, expand Advanced Configuration and confirm single dividers (not doubles) and that the Oriole option’s bottom border is not clipped. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **New Features** * Added configurable width to the shared interstitial layout for Vercel project creation. * Updated the Vercel “new project” flow to use the interstitial UI. * **Bug Fixes** * Prevented child borders/shadows from being clipped in expandable configuration sections. * **Refactor** * Removed legacy Vercel/window layout components and updated routing to rely on the interstitial flow. * Switched advanced and internal-only configuration sections to render inside panel content. * **Documentation** * Refreshed Vercel integration route guidance in the migration checklist and inline route comments. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Joshen Lim <joshenlimek@gmail.com>
## Summary - Adds design-system guidance for the shared Connect interstitial layout used by authorisation, invite, marketplace, CLI, and credit flows - Includes a glanceable example showing the centred 400px card for partner authorise and wrong-account invite states - Documents Studio helpers (`InterstitialLayout`, logo helpers, account row, `OrganizationSelector`) so future surfaces reuse one pattern instead of bespoke shells ## Context Most of the Studio Connect UI work from this effort has already landed. This PR keeps the documentation and design-system example so the pattern stays discoverable. Related: [Shared Connect UI for Authorization and Partner Flows](https://linear.app/supabase/project/shared-connect-ui-for-authorization-and-partner-flows-94587ac29d38) ## Test plan - [ ] Open `/docs/ui-patterns/connect-interstitials` in the design system - [ ] Confirm the page appears under UI Patterns in the nav - [ ] Confirm the example renders the authorise and wrong-account cards side by side - [ ] Skim the guidance for accuracy against current Studio `InterstitialLayout` usage <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **New Features** * Added new design-system “Connect Interstitials” example demos, including branding variations (single vs dual logos) and a complete connect-card flow with account row and sign-out action. * Registered the new Connect Interstitials examples in the design-system example registry. * **Documentation** * Added a “Connect Interstitials” UI Patterns page covering when to use the pattern, recommended card/layout structure, branding/logo guidance, and conventions for states, actions, and copy. * Updated the documentation sidebar to include the new page. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
…47864) ## I have read the [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) file. YES ## What kind of change does this PR introduce? - Add a new blog post: `apps/www/_blog/2026-07-15-supabase-pipelines-public-alpha.mdx`, announcing that Supabase Pipelines is moving from private to public alpha - Covers new schema change support (add/remove/rename columns, nullability/default changes), a faster parallelized initial copy, and new destination request forms for ClickHouse, Snowflake, and DuckLake - Authored by `riccardo_busetti` ## What is the current behavior? N/A — this is a new blog post page at `/blog/supabase-pipelines-public-alpha`. ## What is the new behavior? - New post published at `/blog/supabase-pipelines-public-alpha` ## Additional context n/a <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Announcements** - Published a new blog post announcing **Supabase Pipelines** is now available in **Public Alpha**, with updates on improved performance and operability since private alpha. - **Documentation** - Documented **schema change support**, **faster initial copy** via parallelized table copying, and the pipeline lifecycle based on **Postgres logical replication**. - Added details for the first destination (**BigQuery**), destination request forms (ClickHouse/Snowflake/DuckDBLake), plus **roadmap**, **pricing**, **getting started**, and **public-alpha caveats**. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Ana <ana1337x@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Riccardo Busetti <riccardo.busetti@supabase.io>
#48152) ## I have read the [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) file. YES ## What kind of change does this PR introduce? - Updates the publish date of the "Supabase Pipelines is now in Public Alpha" blog post from July 15 to July 21 - Renames the post file to match the new date - Updates the `date` frontmatter field ## What is the current behavior? The post is dated 2026-07-15. ## What is the new behavior? - The post is dated 2026-07-21 to match the public launch date - File renamed to `apps/www/_blog/2026-07-21-supabase-pipelines-public-alpha.mdx` - Frontmatter `date` set to `'2026-07-21'` ## Additional context N/A <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **Documentation** * Updated the publication date for the Supabase Pipelines public alpha blog post to July 21, 2026. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> Co-authored-by: Ana <ana1337x@users.noreply.github.com>
## What is the current behavior? <img width="533" height="394" alt="Screenshot 2026-07-21 at 11 55 05" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4e5e8fde-5823-4ad2-849e-abad90bfa72a" /> ## What is the new behavior? <img width="501" height="430" alt="Screenshot 2026-07-21 at 12 43 17" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2888d815-8c2c-47db-a058-dc60b208d6b1" /> ## Additional context Also fixed font-weight for strong text in studio to be `font-bold`.
## TL;DR Restores handling for functions with `search_path` set to `''` editing them in the UI was failing with a Postgres `zero-length delimited identifier` error since the SafeSql refactor dropped the empty-string sentinel conversion ## ref - closes #48149 <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **Bug Fixes** * Preserved empty `search_path` configuration values when updating database functions. * Prevented empty configuration values from being altered or lost during function updates. * **Tests** * Added coverage verifying that function definitions can be updated without changing an existing empty `search_path` setting. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- ccr-slack-attribution --> _Requested by **Ivan Vasilov** · [Slack thread](https://supabase.slack.com/archives/C0161K73J1J/p1784635673434979)_ ## I have read the [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) file. YES ## What kind of change does this PR introduce? Chore / cleanup — removes a scheduled GitHub Actions workflow. ## What is the current behavior? The `Dashboard PR Reminder` workflow (`.github/workflows/dashboard-pr-reminder.yml`) runs on a schedule and posts a "Dashboard PRs Older Than 24 Hours" reminder to Slack. It has become too noisy — Jordi flagged that it fired 5 times in 3 days. The #team-frontend team agreed to remove it rather than reschedule it. ## What is the new behavior? The workflow and its exclusively-used supporting scripts are deleted, so the Slack reminder no longer runs. Files removed (each used exclusively by this workflow): - `.github/workflows/dashboard-pr-reminder.yml` — the reminder workflow itself. - `scripts/actions/find-stale-dashboard-prs.ts` — helper invoked only by this workflow's run step; not referenced anywhere else in the repo. - `scripts/actions/send-slack-pr-notification.ts` — helper invoked only by this workflow's run step; not referenced anywhere else in the repo. (This leaves `scripts/actions/` empty, so the directory is removed too.) No shared files were touched. The workflow's `sparse-checkout` of `scripts`/`patches`, `.nvmrc`, and `pnpm-lock.yaml` are repo-wide and remain in place. ## Additional context Verified via a full-repo grep that the two scripts and the workflow file are referenced nowhere outside this workflow before deleting them. --- _Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01RynCtzP874KrpN8CPf7n7n)_ Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Ali Waseem <waseema393@gmail.com>
github-actions
Bot
added
the
documentation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
11 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See Commits and Changes for more details.
Created by
pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)
Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )