Skip to content

docs: list externally-maintained extensions (pg_search/ParadeDB)#241

Open
philippemnoel wants to merge 2 commits into
cloudnative-pg:mainfrom
philippemnoel:docs/external-paradedb-pg_search
Open

docs: list externally-maintained extensions (pg_search/ParadeDB)#241
philippemnoel wants to merge 2 commits into
cloudnative-pg:mainfrom
philippemnoel:docs/external-paradedb-pg_search

Conversation

@philippemnoel

@philippemnoel philippemnoel commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Hi everyone. Philippe here from ParadeDB/pg_search. We are a PostgreSQL extension for full-text and vector search in Postgres. We are a commercial, open-source project and license under AGPL-3.0 to protect ourselves from AWS and other hyperscalers.

We opened #204, and following Gabriele's feedback we started publishing our own cnpg-extensions-containers image, to https://hub.docker.com/r/paradedb/paradedb-extension. I understand our license prohibits being listed in this repo, but I was wondering if the project was willing to document a list of externally-supported extension containers, like ours? This is a slightly self-interested request, in that it will help with our discoverability, but I also expect it could be beneficial for other such extensions (for instance, Timescale's non-permissive extension, or even closed-source ones from hyperscalers). What do you think?

We used the build tooling from this repository. For context:

Happy to adjust the wording as well. Lmk and thank you!

@philippemnoel philippemnoel requested review from a team and NiccoloFei as code owners June 11, 2026 01:04
Signed-off-by: Philippe Noël <philippemnoel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Noël <philippemnoel@gmail.com>
@gbartolini

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We need to find a scalable solution for this problem, and I have a strong feeling that our current approach may not be the best option. I would like to gather input from other maintainers and carefully analyse vendor neutrality while ensuring quality for our users.

@philippemnoel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

We need to find a scalable solution for this problem, and I have a strong feeling that our current approach may not be the best option. I would like to gather input from other maintainers and carefully analyse vendor neutrality while ensuring quality for our users.

Sounds good. We're happy to help in whatever way we can, thank you for considering the request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants