table format for landing page

[AaronJhaj]

table format for landing page - see comment for visual

[github-actions]

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

[AaronJhaj]

[IvanHargreaves]

@AaronJhaj

• Java EE and Jakarta EE samples could be merged with (or be a sub-category) of Liberty Samples
• CICS Explorer SDK Samples might be clearer to say 'Migrated and modernised CICS Explorer SDK samples' - and I presume most of them are also cross-linked from other categories such as the OSGi and Liberty ones?

Otherwise, I'm happy with the groupings.

[AaronJhaj]

@IvanHargreaves the java EE samples are not all Liberty so i'm not sure if it could be a subset of the Liberty samples?

and yes the OSGi and Liberty samples have crossover with the explorer samples. but again there are several other osgi/liberty samples that are not explorer samples hence the separation

[AaronJhaj]

[jt-nti]

The table looks really smart. Just a minor comment about removing the old content completely.

[AaronJhaj]

Are we happy to merge? @IvanHargreaves @jt-nti

[IvanHargreaves]

Liberty is our Java EE / Jakarta EE environment. If there are samples in those sections which are not Liberty, then they are likely to be misplaced. There is a small hybrid area, JDBC and JNDI which are intrinsic to both. If they are running in the OSGi JVM server we would class them as OSGi and not Java EE.

So I think "Liberty (Java EE / Jakarta EE) Samples" would be the best section title and remove the duplicate reference from the description. Everything else looks good to me!

[AaronJhaj]

@IvanHargreaves