Skip to content

chore: update model catalog from bot issues#840

Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/autofix-bot-issues-2026-06-21
Open

chore: update model catalog from bot issues#840
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/autofix-bot-issues-2026-06-21

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automated daily batch of model catalog updates from bot issues.

Included issues

Summary

Issue Provider Primary model Changed models Added models Updated models Verification sources
#837 openai gpt-5.5-pro gpt-5.5-pro
gpt-5.5-pro-2026-04-23
gpt-5.4-pro
gpt-5.4-pro-2026-03-05
None gpt-5.5-pro
gpt-5.5-pro-2026-04-23
gpt-5.4-pro
gpt-5.4-pro-2026-03-05
1
#838 openai gpt-4o-2024-05-13 gpt-4o-2024-05-13
o1-2024-12-17
o4-mini-2025-04-16
None gpt-4o-2024-05-13
o1-2024-12-17
o4-mini-2025-04-16
1
#839 openai gpt-5-2025-08-07 gpt-5-2025-08-07
o3-2025-04-16
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
None gpt-5-2025-08-07
o3-2025-04-16
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
1

Verified metadata

#837: [BOT ISSUE] OpenAI: remove incorrect cached input pricing from gpt-5.5-pro and gpt-5.4-pro

Model Display name Parent Providers Format Flavor Token limits Pricing Lifecycle
gpt-5.5-pro GPT-5.5 Pro openai, azure openai chat input=1050000, output=128000 in/out=30/180 per 1M; cache read=null per 1M multimodal=true; reasoning=true
gpt-5.5-pro-2026-04-23 GPT-5.5 Pro (2026-04-23) gpt-5.5-pro openai, azure openai chat input=1050000, output=128000 in/out=30/180 per 1M; cache read=null per 1M parent=gpt-5.5-pro; multimodal=true; reasoning=true
gpt-5.4-pro GPT-5.4 Pro openai, azure openai chat input=1050000, output=128000 in/out=30/180 per 1M; cache read=null per 1M multimodal=true; reasoning=true
gpt-5.4-pro-2026-03-05 GPT-5.4 Pro (2026-03-05) gpt-5.4-pro openai, azure openai chat input=1050000, output=128000 in/out=30/180 per 1M; cache read=null per 1M parent=gpt-5.4-pro; multimodal=true; reasoning=true

Verification notes

Verification

sync_models vs proposed update

sync_models cross-check found differences. Official provider verification was used for the applied values, and sync_models discrepancies are listed below for review.

Model Field Proposed update sync_models sync_models source models
gpt-5.5-pro input_cache_read_cost_per_mil_tokens n/a 3 gpt-5.5-pro
gpt-5.5-pro-2026-04-23 input_cache_read_cost_per_mil_tokens n/a 3 gpt-5.5-pro-2026-04-23
gpt-5.4-pro input_cache_read_cost_per_mil_tokens n/a 3 gpt-5.4-pro
gpt-5.4-pro-2026-03-05 input_cache_read_cost_per_mil_tokens n/a 3 gpt-5.4-pro-2026-03-05

#838: [BOT ISSUE] OpenAI: add deprecation_date for gpt-4o-2024-05-13, o1-2024-12-17, o4-mini-2025-04-16

Model Display name Parent Providers Format Flavor Token limits Pricing Lifecycle
gpt-4o-2024-05-13 GPT-4o (2024-05-13) gpt-4o openai, azure openai chat input=128000, output=4096 in/out=5/15 per 1M parent=gpt-4o; date=2026-10-23; multimodal=true
o1-2024-12-17 o1 (2024-12-17) o1 openai, azure openai chat input=200000, output=100000 in/out=15/60 per 1M; cache read=7.5 per 1M parent=o1; date=2026-10-23; multimodal=true; reasoning=true
o4-mini-2025-04-16 o4-mini (2025-04-16) o4-mini openai, azure openai chat input=200000, output=100000 in/out=1.1/4.4 per 1M; cache read=0.275 per 1M parent=o4-mini; date=2026-10-23; multimodal=true; reasoning=true

Verification notes

Verification

sync_models vs proposed update

sync_models cross-check found differences. Official provider verification was used for the applied values, and sync_models discrepancies are listed below for review.

Model Field Proposed update sync_models sync_models source models
gpt-4o-2024-05-13 deprecation_date 2026-10-23 n/a gpt-4o-2024-05-13
o1-2024-12-17 deprecation_date 2026-10-23 n/a o1-2024-12-17
o4-mini-2025-04-16 deprecation_date 2026-10-23 n/a o4-mini-2025-04-16

#839: [BOT ISSUE] OpenAI: add deprecation_date for gpt-5-2025-08-07, o3-2025-04-16, gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

Model Display name Parent Providers Format Flavor Token limits Pricing Lifecycle
gpt-5-2025-08-07 GPT-5 (2025-08-07) gpt-5 openai, azure openai chat input=272000, output=128000 in/out=1.25/10 per 1M; cache read=0.125 per 1M parent=gpt-5; date=2026-12-11; multimodal=true; reasoning=true
o3-2025-04-16 o3 (2025-04-16) o3 openai, azure openai chat input=200000, output=100000 in/out=2/8 per 1M; cache read=0.5 per 1M parent=o3; date=2026-12-11; multimodal=true; reasoning=true
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 GPT-5 mini (2025-08-07) gpt-5-mini openai, azure openai chat input=272000, output=128000 in/out=0.25/2 per 1M; cache read=0.025 per 1M parent=gpt-5-mini; date=2026-12-11; multimodal=true; reasoning=true

Verification notes

Verification

sync_models vs proposed update

sync_models cross-check found differences. Official provider verification was used for the applied values, and sync_models discrepancies are listed below for review.

Model Field Proposed update sync_models sync_models source models
gpt-5-2025-08-07 deprecation_date 2026-12-11 n/a gpt-5-2025-08-07
o3-2025-04-16 deprecation_date 2026-12-11 n/a o3-2025-04-16
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 deprecation_date 2026-12-11 n/a gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
ai-proxy Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 21, 2026 11:22am

Request Review

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Codex (@codex) review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 204f1a644d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "Codex (@codex) review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "Codex (@codex) address that feedback".

Comment thread packages/proxy/schema/index.ts Outdated
Comment on lines +605 to +609
"openai.gpt-5.5": ["bedrock"],
"openai.gpt-5.4": ["bedrock"],
"nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b": ["together"],
"moonshot.kimi-k2-thinking": ["bedrock"],
"xai.grok-4.3": ["bedrock"],

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Don't advertise Bedrock for OpenAI-format specs

When a request uses one of these newly mapped Bedrock-only models, getModelEndpointTypes now selects a Bedrock secret, but the catalog entries for openai.gpt-5.5, openai.gpt-5.4, and xai.grok-4.3 still declare format: "openai". That path enters fetchOpenAI, which explicitly rejects secret.type === "bedrock", so these models will always fail through the only provider advertised here unless they are routed through a supported Bedrock/Converse format or not exposed as Bedrock yet.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@github-actions github-actions Bot force-pushed the chore/autofix-bot-issues-2026-06-21 branch from 204f1a6 to a13ed5f Compare June 21, 2026 11:22
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Codex Review Response

Issue: Bedrock-only models with format: "openai" will always fail

Status: Fixed

Codex correctly identified that openai.gpt-5.5, openai.gpt-5.4, and xai.grok-4.3 declared format: "openai" while being Bedrock-only models. The proxy's fetchOpenAI function explicitly rejects Bedrock secrets (proxy.ts:2130), so these models would always error at runtime.

Change: Set format to "converse" for all three models in packages/proxy/schema/model_list.json, matching the convention used by every other Bedrock-only third-party model in the catalog (e.g., openai.gpt-oss-*, mistral.*, moonshot.*, zai.*).

No changes were needed in packages/proxy/schema/index.ts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

1 participant