fix(sphinxdocs): update MODULE.bazel to depend on a released version#3704
Merged
fix(sphinxdocs): update MODULE.bazel to depend on a released version#3704
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the rules_python dependency version in sphinxdocs/MODULE.bazel to 1.8.5. A critical issue was identified where this version update creates a mismatch with the root MODULE.bazel (which is set to 0.0.0), likely causing Bzlmod resolution to fail because of the local_path_override pointing to the parent directory.
rickeylev
approved these changes
Apr 14, 2026
rickeylev
pushed a commit
to rickeylev/rules_python
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2026
…azel-contrib#3704) Related to the failure in rc0. See bazel-contrib#3688. (cherry picked from commit bf2d3c4)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related to the failure in rc0.
See #3688.