Skip to content

chore: add gt workflow - #1790

Open
nlucero wants to merge 11 commits into
mainfrom
chore/gt-workflow
Open

nlucero wants to merge 11 commits into
mainfrom
chore/gt-workflow

Conversation

@nlucero

@nlucero nlucero commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

  • Add a new workflow for automatic translations via gt

References

Testing

Test dry-run: https://github.com/auth0/docs-v2/actions/runs/33107362396/job/98640718083?pr=1790

Checklist

  • I've read and followed CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • I've tested the site build for this change locally.
  • I've made appropriate docs updates for any code or config changes.
  • I've coordinated with the Product Docs and/or Docs Management team about non-trivial changes.

@mintlify

mintlify Bot commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated
auth0 🟢 Ready View Preview Sep 15, 2026, 2:08 PM

💡 Tip: Enable Automations to automatically generate PRs for you.

@mintlify

mintlify Bot commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated
auth0-docs-dev 🟢 Ready View Preview Sep 15, 2026, 2:08 PM

💡 Tip: Enable Automations to automatically generate PRs for you.

@mintlify

mintlify Bot commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated
auth0-docs-staging 🟢 Ready View Preview Sep 15, 2026, 2:07 PM

💡 Tip: Enable Automations to automatically generate PRs for you.

Comment thread .github/workflows/translate.yml Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/translate.yml Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/translate.yml Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/translate.yml Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/translate.yml Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/translate.yml Outdated
@nlucero
nlucero requested review from hazel-nut and mikemimik August 31, 2026 13:56
mikemimik
mikemimik previously approved these changes Sep 1, 2026

@mikemimik mikemimik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mikemimik mikemimik added the DO NOT MERGE Only the PR author should merge, even if approved. label Sep 1, 2026

@hazel-nut hazel-nut left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❓ how are we handling updating the navigation and redirects JSONs for translations?

Comment thread .github/workflows/translate.yml Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/translate.yml Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/translate.yml Outdated
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Full Github Actions output

Run on commit b0f8add.

@hazel-nut hazel-nut left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not a review, just unblocking. merging this does mean the generated translation PRs will:

  • break the translations' navigation, unless someone is manually updating it for each PR
  • break links unless someone is manually updating redirects for each PR

this github action will not address the following issues:

  • the translations are already out of date because we pushed the mass retranslation before there was a system to keep it updated in #1824

  • the translated navigation is untranslated in many places because, to fix the broken navigation from the mass retranslation, we copied the english navigation structure over in #1866

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants