Skip to content

docs(physical-plan): correct the documentation for GroupColumn::vectorized_equal_to#23639

Open
mzabaluev wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
mzabaluev:group-column-vectorized-equal-to-fix-doc
Open

docs(physical-plan): correct the documentation for GroupColumn::vectorized_equal_to#23639
mzabaluev wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
mzabaluev:group-column-vectorized-equal-to-fix-doc

Conversation

@mzabaluev

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Correct the documentation based on the actual behavior in the implementations and at the call sites.

Correct the documentation based on the actual behavior in the
implementations and at the call sites.
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the physical-plan Changes to the physical-plan crate label Jul 16, 2026
@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (main@95de385). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #23639   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   80.65%           
=======================================
  Files           ?     1086           
  Lines           ?   366098           
  Branches        ?   366098           
=======================================
  Hits            ?   295281           
  Misses          ?    53222           
  Partials        ?    17595           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@Rich-T-kid Rich-T-kid left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think the existing comment is necessarily 'incorrect' but I like the more in depth explanation.

@mzabaluev

mzabaluev commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I don't think the existing comment is necessarily 'incorrect'

It says the implementations record the true result, which can be misleading. To the contrary, implementations are obligated to set false, unless it's been set at this index previously.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

physical-plan Changes to the physical-plan crate

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants