Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
#11900
Rationale for this change
When a query has
ORDER BY <cols> LIMIT Non top of an outer join and all sort columns come from the preserved side,DataFusion currently runs the full join first, then sorts and limits. We can push a copy of the
Sort(fetch=N)to the preserved input, reducing the number of rows entering the join.Before:
After:
What changes are included in this PR?
A new logical optimizer rule
PushDownTopKThroughJointhat:Sortwithfetch = Some(N)(TopK)Projectionto find aJoinSort(fetch=N)on the preserved childAre these changes tested?
Yes through UT
Are there any user-facing changes?
No API changes.