GH-32503: [Docs][Benchmarking] Document pull request benchmark hooks - #50953
Open
nightcityblade wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
GH-32503: [Docs][Benchmarking] Document pull request benchmark hooks#50953nightcityblade wants to merge 1 commit into
nightcityblade wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
|
uros-b
approved these changes
Aug 24, 2026
Member
|
Thank you @nightcityblade! LGTM |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
Fixes #32503.
The developer benchmark guide explains local Archery runs but does not describe how pull requests use the remote benchmark service or repository-owned build hooks.
What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes. The developer documentation now explains pull request benchmarking and benchmark hook changes.
AI usage
This documentation update was drafted with Codex assistance. I reviewed the current workflow against recent Arrow pull request benchmark comments, checked every line of the change, and verified the rendered output locally.