Skip to content

UN-3815 [FIX] Validate webhook URLs in one place, at both sinks - #2214

Open
athul-rs wants to merge 13 commits into
mainfrom
UN-3794-webhook-egress
Open

UN-3815 [FIX] Validate webhook URLs in one place, at both sinks#2214
athul-rs wants to merge 13 commits into
mainfrom
UN-3794-webhook-egress

Conversation

@athul-rs

@athul-rs athul-rs commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

  • Adds unstract.core.network.ssrf.is_safe_webhook_url, one validator for tenant-supplied webhook URLs.
  • Calls it from inside both webhook sinks — postprocessor._make_webhook_request and notification_utils.send_webhook_request — rather than from their callers.
  • Turns off redirect following on the notification path.
  • Validates the URL at notification creation time in NotificationSerializer.
  • Applies the same check to the internal webhook-test endpoint and reduces its response to the status code.

Why

Two paths send a request to a URL a tenant supplied, and they disagreed on what they checked.

  • Postprocessing checked with a different parser than the one that connects. _is_safe_public_url read the URL with urlparse, while the transport under requests resolves it with urllib3. The two do not always agree on the host, so the host that was validated is not necessarily the host the socket connects to. Verified still divergent on the pinned urllib3 2.7.0 / requests 2.33.0.
  • The check was in the caller, not the sink. _is_safe_public_url ran one frame up in answer_prompt, so any new caller of _make_webhook_request reached the network unchecked.
  • Notification delivery checked nothing. send_webhook_request went straight to requests.post with no scheme or host validation, and left allow_redirects at the requests default of True — so a redirect, not the configured URL, decided where the request landed (and 302/303 rewrites POST to GET). Notification.url is a URLField, which validates shape only.
  • The internal test endpoint returned the response body and headers of whatever it reached, verbatim, with no URL check at all.

How

  • The validator refuses in three steps: the two parsers must agree on the host; the scheme must be in the caller's allowlist and the URL must not carry credentials; and every address the host resolves to must be publicly routable (loopback, private, link-local — which covers the cloud metadata endpoints — reserved, multicast and unspecified are all refused).
  • Comparing the two parsers is an invariant rather than a list of characters to reject, so it holds as either parser changes.
  • Hosts are normalized before comparison — brackets stripped, trailing dot dropped, lowercased, IDNA-encoded — because urllib3 keeps brackets on IPv6 literals and punycodes unicode hosts while urlparse does neither. Without this, https://[2606:4700::1111]/ and https://пример.рф/ would be rejected as parser disagreements.
  • allowed_schemes defaults to ("http", "https"); the postprocessing path passes ("https",) to keep the TLS-only behaviour it already had.
  • The guard sits inside each sink, so the control does not depend on callers remembering it.

Can this PR break any existing features. If yes, please list possible items. If no, please explain why. (PS: Admins do not merge the PR without this section filled)

Yes, in three ways, all intentional and all covered:

  1. A notification configured with a non-public URL now fails. Existing rows pointing at an internal host stop delivering (the task retries up to its configured max_retries, which is capped at 4, then gives up), and editing such a notification returns a 400 on the url field until it is pointed at a public address. Deliberate — that is the behaviour being fixed — but it is a visible change for anyone who had one configured.
  2. Notification webhooks no longer follow redirects. Any integration relying on a 302 to its real endpoint breaks and must publish the final URL instead.
  3. The internal webhook-test endpoint no longer returns response_body / response_headers. Any internal caller reading those fields needs updating; status_code and success are unchanged.

Legitimate public webhooks are unaffected — test_public_url_is_still_delivered and the public-target cases pin that, including trailing-dot, uppercase, punycode and unicode-IDN hosts.

Known ceiling, stated rather than implied: resolve-then-connect cannot cover a name re-resolved to an internal address between the check and the socket. The control for that is an egress policy on the worker pods, not application code.

One operational note: the validator resolves DNS inline, including inside NotificationSerializer.validate. getaddrinfo takes no timeout, so a slow resolver stalls that request thread for the system resolver's timeout.

Database Migrations

None.

Env Config

None.

Relevant Docs

None.

Related Issues or PRs

UN-3815

Dependencies Versions

Unchanged. urllib3 is already a transitive dependency of requests; unstract-core pins requests==2.33.0.

Notes on Testing

  • unstract/core/tests/test_ssrf_guard.py — parser-disagreement cases in both directions, internal targets, disallowed schemes and credentials, public targets that must still pass (IPv6, IDN, trailing dot, uppercase), multi-answer DNS where one address is internal, and hosts that make getaddrinfo raise rather than fail to resolve. Plus the notification sink: blocked URLs never reach the network, redirects are off, public URLs still deliver.
  • workers/tests/test_webhook_ssrf_sink.py — calls _make_webhook_request directly with blocked URLs and asserts requests.post is never reached, which is the point of moving the guard into the sink.
  • backend/notification_v2/tests/test_webhook_ssrf.py — serializer rejects non-public URLs; the internal endpoint refuses before issuing a request and no longer echoes the body or headers.
  • DNS is stubbed so the suite does not touch the network. The one test that must exercise the real resolver restores it explicitly, since stubbing it would have made that test pass for the wrong reason.
  • Every assertion was confirmed to fail against main before the fix. Full backend suite: identical failure set to main (36, all pre-existing), zero new.

Screenshots

Checklist

I have read and understood the Contribution Guidelines.

@athul-rs
athul-rs requested review from jaseemjaskp and ritwik-g July 27, 2026 04:36
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 390cc4e8-fb74-44a1-ac04-6647601b1545

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 71c9d3b and f7dceb4.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • backend/notification_v2/internal_views.py
  • backend/notification_v2/serializers.py
  • backend/notification_v2/tests/test_webhook_ssrf.py
  • unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/__init__.py
  • unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/ssrf.py
  • unstract/core/tests/test_ssrf_guard.py
  • workers/tests/test_variable_replacement_postprocessor.py

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Security
    • Blocked unsafe webhook destinations, including private, local, malformed, and non-HTTPS URLs.
    • Prevented redirects during webhook delivery to avoid unintended request behavior.
    • Webhook test responses now expose only essential delivery results, without request or response details.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Redirect responses are no longer reported as successful deliveries.
    • Unsafe webhook requests are rejected before any network call is made.

Walkthrough

Webhook URL validation is centralized in a shared SSRF guard and applied to backend serializers, the webhook test endpoint, core notification delivery, and worker webhook sinks. Redirects are disabled, sensitive test response fields are removed, and regression tests cover internal targets, DNS behavior, parsing, and delivery.

Changes

Webhook SSRF Protection

Layer / File(s) Summary
Shared URL safety validator
unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/ssrf.py, unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/__init__.py, unstract/core/tests/test_ssrf_guard.py
Adds and exports is_safe_webhook_url, including normalization, scheme and credential checks, public-address validation, and optional DNS resolution.
Backend validation and webhook test endpoint
backend/notification_v2/serializers.py, backend/notification_v2/internal_views.py, backend/notification_v2/tests/test_webhook_ssrf.py
Validates notification URLs and test targets, disables redirects, limits returned test data, and covers partial updates and delivery outcomes.
Core notification sink enforcement
unstract/core/src/unstract/core/notification_utils.py, unstract/core/tests/test_ssrf_guard.py
Rejects unsafe destinations before delivery, disables redirects, and tests blocked and public delivery paths.
Worker webhook sink integration
workers/executor/executors/answer_prompt.py, workers/executor/executors/postprocessor.py, workers/tests/test_webhook_ssrf_sink.py, workers/tests/test_variable_replacement_postprocessor.py
Uses the shared HTTPS-only validator at worker webhook boundaries and verifies blocked URLs do not trigger outbound requests.

Estimated code review effort: 4 (Complex) | ~45 minutes

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant Client
  participant WebhookSurface
  participant is_safe_webhook_url
  participant DNS
  participant HTTPClient
  Client->>WebhookSurface: Provide webhook URL
  WebhookSurface->>is_safe_webhook_url: Validate scheme, host, and credentials
  is_safe_webhook_url->>DNS: Resolve normalized hostname when enabled
  DNS-->>is_safe_webhook_url: Return resolved addresses
  is_safe_webhook_url-->>WebhookSurface: Accept or reject target
  WebhookSurface->>HTTPClient: Send POST with redirects disabled
  HTTPClient-->>WebhookSurface: Return delivery result
Loading

Suggested reviewers: jaseemjaskp, ritwik-g, chandrasekharan-zipstack, muhammad-ali

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 39.47% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main change: centralizing webhook URL validation at the sinks.
Description check ✅ Passed The description follows the template and covers What, Why, How, breaking changes, migrations, env, testing, and related issue sections.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1
📝 Generate docstrings 💡
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch UN-3794-webhook-egress

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@greptile-apps

greptile-apps Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Greptile Summary

The follow-up completes the webhook hardening fixes:

  • Uses ipaddress.is_global so resolved RFC 6598 and other non-global addresses are rejected.
  • Reports webhook-test requests as successful only for 2xx responses and no longer exposes request or response details.
  • Validates missing webhook URLs across creation, type transitions, and legacy URL-less records while leaving existing valid URLs untouched during unrelated updates.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge.

No blocking failure remains; the previously reported non-global-address, redirect-classification, and missing-URL validation issues are fixed or invalidated by the current code.

Important Files Changed

Filename Overview
unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/ssrf.py Centralizes webhook URL validation and now rejects every resolved address that is not globally routable.
backend/notification_v2/serializers.py Enforces required webhook destinations while avoiding revalidation of unchanged valid URLs.
backend/notification_v2/internal_views.py Guards test webhook targets, disables redirects, limits success to 2xx, and removes sensitive response details.
unstract/core/src/unstract/core/notification_utils.py Applies the shared SSRF validation at the notification delivery sink and disables redirects.
workers/executor/executors/postprocessor.py Applies TLS-only shared URL validation directly at the postprocessing webhook sink.

Flowchart

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart LR
  Input[Tenant webhook URL] --> Parse[Require parser agreement]
  Parse --> Literal{Address literal?}
  Literal -->|Yes| Global[Require globally routable address]
  Literal -->|No, serializer| Save[Save configuration]
  Literal -->|No, delivery sink| DNS[Resolve every address]
  DNS --> Global
  Global -->|Safe| Send[Send without redirects]
  Global -->|Unsafe| Refuse[Refuse request]
Loading

Reviews (11): Last reviewed commit: "UN-3815 [FIX] Gate the required-webhook-..." | Re-trigger Greptile

Comment thread unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/ssrf.py Outdated
Comment thread backend/notification_v2/internal_views.py Outdated
Comment thread backend/notification_v2/serializers.py Outdated

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@backend/notification_v2/serializers.py`:
- Around line 42-54: Update _validate_url to validate only when “url” is present
in the incoming data, avoiding re-validation of the instance’s existing URL
during unrelated PATCH requests. Preserve the public-address check and
ValidationError for newly supplied URLs, while allowing other fields on legacy
records to update.

In `@unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/ssrf.py`:
- Around line 58-73: The synchronous getaddrinfo call in _resolve can block
request-handling threads for the resolver’s full timeout. Bound DNS resolution
with an explicit timeout using a suitable worker-thread executor or
timeout-capable DNS resolver, return an empty set when the deadline is exceeded,
and preserve the existing direct-IP and resolution-failure behavior.
- Around line 76-88: Update _is_public to return ip.is_global after parsing the
address, replacing the manually assembled
private/loopback/link-local/reserved/multicast/unspecified predicate so RFC 6598
shared-address-space addresses and all other non-globally-reachable ranges are
rejected.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 6f65e249-a62d-4973-98f3-0ef16c4d426a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 023b140 and f481b06.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • backend/notification_v2/internal_views.py
  • backend/notification_v2/serializers.py
  • backend/notification_v2/tests/__init__.py
  • backend/notification_v2/tests/test_webhook_ssrf.py
  • unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/__init__.py
  • unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/ssrf.py
  • unstract/core/src/unstract/core/notification_utils.py
  • unstract/core/tests/test_ssrf_guard.py
  • workers/executor/executors/answer_prompt.py
  • workers/executor/executors/postprocessor.py
  • workers/tests/test_webhook_ssrf_sink.py

Comment thread backend/notification_v2/serializers.py
Comment thread unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/ssrf.py Outdated
Comment thread unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/ssrf.py Outdated
@athul-rs athul-rs changed the title UN-3794 [FIX] Validate webhook URLs in one place, at both sinks UN-3815 [FIX] Validate webhook URLs in one place, at both sinks Jul 27, 2026
@athul-rs
athul-rs marked this pull request as draft July 27, 2026 19:16
athul-rs added 2 commits July 29, 2026 15:10
Two paths send a request to a URL a tenant supplied: prompt
postprocessing and pipeline notifications. They disagreed on what they
checked.

Postprocessing read the URL with urlparse while the transport under
requests resolves it with urllib3. The two parsers do not always agree on
the host, so the host that was checked is not necessarily the host the
socket connects to. Notification delivery did not check the URL at all,
and left allow_redirects at the requests default, so a redirect decided
where the request landed.

Add unstract.core.network.ssrf.is_safe_webhook_url and call it from both
sinks rather than from their callers, so a new caller does not have to
remember it. It refuses when the two parsers disagree on the host — an
invariant, not a list of characters to reject — when the URL carries
credentials, and when any resolved address is not publicly routable.
Hosts are normalized before comparison so IPv6 literals and unicode IDN
hosts are not rejected. Redirects are off on both paths.

Also applies the guard to the internal webhook-test endpoint, which had
none, and reduces its response to the status code — the body and headers
of whatever it reached are not the caller's to read.
NotificationSerializer now rejects a non-public URL at creation instead
of storing it and failing at delivery.

Note the ceiling: resolve-then-connect cannot cover a name re-resolved
between the check and the socket. That needs an egress policy on the
worker pods.
Three corrections from review:

- _is_public enumerated six negative flags, which misses ranges that
  belong to none of them. RFC 6598 shared address space (100.64.0.0/10)
  passed as public on Python 3.12, as do RFC 2544 benchmarking and IETF
  protocol assignment ranges. Use ipaddress.is_global instead: an
  allowlist maintained against the IANA registries, so it stays correct
  as ranges are added, and shorter.
- NotificationSerializer re-resolved the stored URL on any PATCH, so a
  brief DNS failure or a legacy record made an unrelated field edit fail
  on a field the caller never sent. Only validate a URL that was
  supplied; the sink guard remains the real control.
- The internal webhook-test endpoint reported success on any status
  below 400, but redirects are not followed, so a 301/302 means the
  payload never reached the destination. Report success on 2xx only.

Each has a test that fails without the corresponding fix.
@athul-rs
athul-rs force-pushed the UN-3794-webhook-egress branch from f481b06 to 71c9d3b Compare July 29, 2026 09:42
@athul-rs
athul-rs marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2026 09:42

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@backend/notification_v2/tests/test_webhook_ssrf.py`:
- Around line 42-44: Remove live DNS dependencies in all three tests: in
backend/notification_v2/tests/test_webhook_ssrf.py lines 42-44, mock the shared
SSRF resolver to return a stable public address; in lines 81-86 and 94-100, stub
the endpoint validator as safe so response serialization and redirect handling
remain isolated from network resolution.
- Around line 81-92: Update the webhook endpoint exercised by _post and its test
test_response_body_and_headers_are_not_echoed to return only the upstream status
code, removing request_headers, request_payload, and url from the response.
Replace the individual field exclusions with an exact response-data shape
assertion containing only status_code, while preserving the existing status and
redirect assertions.

In `@unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/__init__.py`:
- Line 6: Update the __all__ declaration to order its exported symbols as
HTTPMethod, HttpClient, get_retry_session, and is_safe_webhook_url, satisfying
Ruff’s RUF022 ordering requirement.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 98c5cd4b-617e-466e-87c1-8b418219db5f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f481b06 and 71c9d3b.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • backend/notification_v2/internal_views.py
  • backend/notification_v2/serializers.py
  • backend/notification_v2/tests/__init__.py
  • backend/notification_v2/tests/test_webhook_ssrf.py
  • unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/__init__.py
  • unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/ssrf.py
  • unstract/core/src/unstract/core/notification_utils.py
  • unstract/core/tests/test_ssrf_guard.py
  • workers/executor/executors/answer_prompt.py
  • workers/executor/executors/postprocessor.py
  • workers/tests/test_webhook_ssrf_sink.py
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
  • workers/executor/executors/postprocessor.py
  • backend/notification_v2/serializers.py
  • backend/notification_v2/internal_views.py
  • unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/ssrf.py
  • workers/executor/executors/answer_prompt.py

Comment thread backend/notification_v2/tests/test_webhook_ssrf.py
Comment thread backend/notification_v2/tests/test_webhook_ssrf.py
Comment thread unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/__init__.py Outdated
athul-rs added 2 commits July 31, 2026 00:36
The guard now runs inside _make_webhook_request, before the mocked
requests.post. These tests use hook.example.com, which does not resolve,
so two success-path assertions failed and several failure-path ones
started passing for the wrong reason.

Patch the guard for this class only — it tests postprocessing behaviour,
not URL safety, which has its own coverage in test_webhook_ssrf_sink and
unstract/core's test_ssrf_guard.
Review findings on the egress guard:

- is_safe_webhook_url resolved DNS inline, and NotificationSerializer
  calls it while handling a request. socket.getaddrinfo honours no
  timeout, so a slow or hostile resolver would stall the worker serving
  that request. Add resolve=False for request-path callers: the
  syntactic checks and literal-IP check still run, and a hostname that
  points inward is caught at the sink, which is the real control.
- The internal webhook-test endpoint returned request_headers, which
  carries the Authorization value built from authorization_key. Response
  is now status, success and url only.
- Sort __all__ (RUF022).
- Stub DNS in the backend webhook tests; they resolved example.com for
  real and would fail in an isolated runner.
Comment thread backend/notification_v2/serializers.py Outdated
@ritwik-g

ritwik-g commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@greptileai please review this

@athul-rs

athul-rs commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@greptileai re-review this PR

@chandrasekharan-zipstack chandrasekharan-zipstack left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Standardized review — PR #2214

Verdict: REQUEST CHANGES

Summary — Critical: 0 · High: 6 · Medium: 6 · Low: 7 · Lenses run: 16/16

Reviewed under the unstract:standard-review 16-lens rubric. Findings are deduplicated against the existing CodeRabbit and Greptile threads. Not re-raised:

  • CodeRabbit's Critical on ssrf.py:73 (unbounded DNS on request threads) — you took it, resolve=False landed. Resolved.
  • Greptile's serializers.py:61 "internal hostnames pass creation validation" and your "deliberate trade" reply, which Greptile accepted. I am not reopening the trade-off — the sink is the real control and that reasoning holds. The finding I do file on that line is about the docstring contradicting itself and about there being no failure surface at all on the delivery path, neither of which the thread covered.
  • Greptile's internal_views.py:364 "unfollowed redirects report success" — fixed by the 2xx only change.
  • CodeRabbit's serializers.py:65 PATCH re-validation — fixed by the "url" not in data early return.
  • CodeRabbit's test_webhook_ssrf.py:62 live-DNS-in-unit-tests — fixed by the stub.
  • CodeRabbit's network/__init__.py:6 RUF022 __all__ sort — done.

One correction offered rather than filed, since it is not my thread to close: Greptile's and CodeRabbit's ssrf.py:88 "non-global addresses pass validation" (e.g. 100.64.0.1) looks like a false positive. Measured on the pinned CPython 3.12.9: IPv4Address("100.64.0.1").is_global is False, as are 198.18.0.1, 192.0.0.1, fc00::1, fe80::1, ::, 240.0.0.1, ::ffff:127.0.0.1. _is_public refuses all of them today.

Lens checklist

# Lens Result
1 Spec & intent Clean
2 Architectural fit See M1
3 Correctness & edge cases See H2, H3, H4, M3, M4, M5
4 Security See H1. Core guard verified sound — see below
5 Data integrity & migrations N/A — no schema change
6 Concurrency N/A
7 API & contract compatibility Clean — no consumer of the removed response_body/response_headers/request_headers/request_payload exists in OSS or unstract-cloud; the endpoint has no caller at all outside its own test
8 Reliability & resilience See H3, M2
9 Performance & cost See M6
10 Observability See H5
11 Operational safety See open question 2
12 LLM/agent See H4 — postprocessing sits on the prompt path
13 Testing See H6
14 Dependencies & build Clean — urllib3 is undeclared in unstract/core/pyproject.toml, but network/retry.py:3 already imported it directly, so this PR does not change that
15 Code quality Clean
16 Doc & comment accuracy See H1, H2, M3, M4, and Lows

Unanchored findings (outside the diff hunks)

[Medium] [Lens 2, 4] — A third webhook sink keeps its own weaker validator, against this PR's stated premise. workers/shared/patterns/notification/webhook.py:29-68, exported via shared/patterns/__init__.py:18. Its check is parsed.hostname.startswith(("10.", "172.", "192.168.")) plus a hardcoded ["localhost", "127.0.0.1", "0.0.0.0"] list — it misses 169.254.169.254, all of 100.64/10, [::1], decimal/octal encodings and every hostname that resolves inward, while over-blocking legitimate hosts across all of 172.0.0.0/8. It then posts with follow_redirects=True at :125, and its except Exception at :65-67 collapses any parse error into a generic string. I found no live caller in OSS or unstract-cloud, so this is latent rather than exploitable — but ssrf.py:5-6 says the point of this module is "so a new sink does not have to carry its own copy of the rules", and a future caller wiring into WorkerWebhookService inherits none of it. Delete it if dead, or route it through is_safe_webhook_url with follow_redirects=False.

Low (7)

  • unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/ssrf.py:79-80_is_public's docstring calls is_global "an allowlist maintained against the IANA special-purpose registries". CPython 3.12.9 implements it as self not in self._constants._public_network and not self.is_private — a denylist negating a fixed 14-entry list, updated only when a new CPython lands in the image. The second half of the docstring is correct and worth keeping: 100.64.0.1 really does measure is_private=False, is_global=False, is_reserved=False, so the "enumerating negative flags misses it" argument holds.
  • unstract/core/tests/test_ssrf_guard.py:67-71 — the comment "Ranges that belong to no single is_private-style flag" is right for 100.64.0.1 only; 198.18.0.1 and 192.0.0.1 both measure is_private=True. Someone trimming the list "because is_private covers these" would remove the one case that justifies using is_global.
  • unstract/core/tests/test_ssrf_guard.py:8-9 — "the resolver is exercised separately through the public-address cases" is backwards; the stub_dns fixture is autouse=True, so those cases run against the stub. The real-resolver case is test_unresolvable_hosts_return_false_rather_than_raising, whose own docstring is accurate (verified: getaddrinfo is invoked, raises during IDNA encoding, no DNS query leaves the box).
  • unstract/core/tests/test_ssrf_guard.py:28 — the fixture key rebind.test implies TOCTOU rebinding coverage; the test at :169 covers a multi-answer RRset. Rebinding is correctly stated as a ceiling in the module docstring and not tested — the name invites the opposite conclusion. multi-answer.test would read straight.
  • Both DNS stubs (test_ssrf_guard.py:33-40, backend/notification_v2/tests/test_webhook_ssrf.py:33-42) patch socket.getaddrinfo process-wide, since ssrf.py does import socket. Not an isolation defect today — monkeypatch restores at teardown, both suites are green serially and under -n 4, and nothing else in either module resolves. The tell is that test_unresolvable_hosts_... has to re-patch the real resolver back in. Patching ssrf._resolve instead would keep the blast radius local.
  • backend/notification_v2/tests/test_webhook_ssrf.py:60, :64assert NotificationSerializer().validate(data) == data compares the same object to itself; only the absence of a raised exception is being tested.
  • PR-narrative comments that go stale on merge: test_webhook_ssrf.py:6 and :80 ("used to return the response body", "had no URL check"), workers/tests/test_webhook_ssrf_sink.py:3 ("The URL check used to run one frame up"). Repo CLAUDE.md asks for comments that read correctly without the change's context — stating the invariant works better.

Verified sound, for the record

The core guard holds up, and I want that on the record alongside the findings.

requests.models.PreparedRequest.prepare_url was traced on the pinned pair (requests==2.33.0, urllib3==2.7.0): urllib3 2.7 already returns an ASCII punycoded host, so unicode_is_ascii(host) is true and requests' own idna.encode path is skipped — meaning the host requests connects to really is parse_url(url).host, and the parser-agreement comparison is genuinely the right invariant. A ~4000-URL fuzz plus a 24-case hand-built corpus (backslash-userinfo in both directions, @@, %2f@, #@, ?@, ideographic and fullwidth full stops, %00, whitespace variants): every case that made requests dial evil.example was refused, and no exception escaped is_safe_webhook_url in either resolve mode.

strip("[]") on unmatched brackets could not be turned into a bypass — urllib3 raises LocationParseError on every unbalanced-bracket URL first. IPv6 literals survive normalization correctly ([::1]::1, [::]::, [::ffff:127.0.0.1] unchanged), and all parse in ipaddress. "".encode("idna") returns b'' without raising. Decimal, octal and hex IPv4 (2130706433, 0177.0.0.1, 0x7f.0.0.1, 127.1) are blocked at the sink: both parsers agree, ipaddress rejects them, and glibc getaddrinfo resolves all four to 127.0.0.1. NotificationViewSet is the only writer of Notification.url — no bulk_create, no admin registration, and WebhookInternalViewSet is read-only. WebhookTestSerializer.url is URLField(required=True), and DRF accepts all three INTERNAL_URLS test inputs including the backslash one, so those tests genuinely exercise the guard rather than passing on a field-level 400. No tests were deleted or weakened — the removed _is_safe_public_url had no coverage before this PR. All three new test files land in existing CI rig groups.

One curiosity, noted but not filed: 64:ff9b::7f00:1 (NAT64 well-known prefix mapping to 127.0.0.1) measures is_global == True. Only reachable with a NAT64 gateway on the pod network.

Open questions

  1. Is retrying a deterministic SSRF refusal intended? See M2.
  2. Unstract ships on-prem, where a customer's webhook target on 10.x is legitimate. There is no allowlist or opt-out — ENABLE_WEBHOOK_DELIVERY is all-or-nothing. Is breaking those deployments intended, or does this want a WEBHOOK_ALLOWED_PRIVATE_HOSTS escape hatch before it ships?

Reviewed with unstract:standard-review v0.18.1 (16-lens rubric, 4 specialist agents). Comments are advisory; event: COMMENT, no merge gate.

Comment thread backend/notification_v2/internal_views.py
Comment thread backend/notification_v2/serializers.py Outdated
Comment thread unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/ssrf.py
Comment thread workers/executor/executors/postprocessor.py
Comment thread unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/ssrf.py Outdated
Comment thread unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/ssrf.py Outdated
Comment thread unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/ssrf.py Outdated
Comment thread backend/notification_v2/serializers.py Outdated
Comment thread workers/executor/executors/answer_prompt.py Outdated
Comment thread unstract/core/src/unstract/core/network/ssrf.py Outdated
athul-rs and others added 4 commits August 11, 2026 14:09
Reason the refusals instead of collapsing them into a bare False, and fix the
cases where the guard's stated contract did not match what it ran.

- The guard now returns a reason. is_safe_webhook_url keeps its boolean shape
  and logs the reason with the host; webhook_url_refusal exposes it so a sink
  can separate a resolver outage, which may clear, from a refusal that never
  will. A refused notification is marked non-retryable and dead-letters at
  once rather than re-resolving a tenant-supplied hostname on every attempt.
- Normalize hosts with urllib3's own encoder. The stdlib "idna" codec is
  IDNA-2003, so it read fass.de where the transport dialled xn--fa-hia.de and
  the parser-agreement check refused every such host.
- Parse legacy IPv4 literals. 2130706433, 0177.0.0.1 and 127.1 are all
  127.0.0.1, but ipaddress.ip_address parses none of them, so the no-resolve
  path took them for hostnames and let them through. localhost is refused by
  name on that path too.
- Stop echoing request_headers and request_payload from the webhook-test
  error branch: it carried back the Authorization value built from
  authorization_key, and a host that simply times out reaches it.
- Require a URL on webhook creation. url is null=True, so DRF made it
  optional and a webhook could persist with no destination at all.
- Drop the duplicate guard in _run_webhook_postprocess. The sink applies the
  identical check, so it only bought a second blocking getaddrinfo per prompt
  per document.
- Correct the docstrings that overstated the guarantees: the check order, the
  resolve=False split, and the serializer's claim that internal hostnames are
  refused at save time.

Tests: allow-path coverage on both worker sinks, so a guard that refuses
everything no longer keeps the suite green; the ftp-scheme mutant that
previously passed now fails three cases. Adds legacy-literal, IDN
normalization, refusal-reason and retryability cases, plus a transport-failure
case pinning that the credential is not echoed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Comment thread backend/notification_v2/serializers.py Outdated
…ust create

`self.partial` alone was the wrong gate. A PATCH that switches an existing
URL-less notification to WEBHOOK creates a destination-less webhook just as a
create does, and the partial check suppressed the validation. Now the type
change is checked alongside it.

Raised by Greptile on the previous push. Latent rather than live today, since
NotificationType has only WEBHOOK, but the enum is written to be extended and
the hole is in the fix that exists to close exactly this case.

Mutation-tested: reverting to the partial-only gate fails the new case.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Comment thread backend/notification_v2/serializers.py
athul-rs and others added 2 commits August 12, 2026 19:17
…ckfile

Declaring `idna` on unstract-core invalidated the lockfile of every package
that depends on it, not just the four updated with the original change. The
e2e image build runs `uv sync --locked`, so `tool-sidecar` failed to build.

Adds the entry to the seven remaining locks. `unstract/workflow-execution`
also picked up an `unstract-sdk1` entry that was already missing before this
branch — that lock was stale independently and `uv lock --check` now passes
there for the first time.

All 13 lockfiles verified with `uv lock --check`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Comment thread backend/notification_v2/serializers.py Outdated
…not on partial

A PATCH that omitted `url` on an existing WEBHOOK row whose stored URL was
already null passed validation and left the row undeliverable: neither
`not self.partial` nor the type-transition check fired.

Gating on `getattr(self.instance, "url", None)` alone covers every route into
that state — create, switch to WEBHOOK, and an unrelated edit of a legacy row
— and is simpler than the two conditions it replaces. A row that already has a
URL is untouched, so the documented PATCH case still works.

Raised by Greptile; its suggested predicate was better than the one it
replaced. Mutation-tested: restoring the partial gate fails two cases.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Unstract test results

Per-group results

Status Group Tier Passed Failed Errors Skipped Duration (s)
e2e-api-deployment e2e 3 0 0 0 16.7
e2e-coowners e2e 1 0 0 0 1.8
e2e-etl e2e 1 0 0 0 8.7
e2e-login e2e 2 0 0 0 1.3
e2e-prompt-studio e2e 1 0 0 0 4.5
e2e-smoke e2e 2 0 0 0 2.6
e2e-workflow e2e 1 0 0 0 16.5
integration-backend integration 290 0 0 26 46.0
integration-connectors integration 1 0 0 7 7.9
integration-workers integration 140 0 0 1 49.0
unit-backend unit 1020 0 0 1 42.3
unit-connectors unit 63 0 0 0 10.3
unit-core unit 98 0 0 0 2.0
unit-platform-service unit 15 0 0 0 2.8
unit-rig unit 117 0 0 0 5.7
unit-sdk1 unit 518 0 0 0 23.6
unit-workers unit 1355 0 0 1 94.7
TOTAL 3628 0 0 36 336.4

Critical paths

⚠️ Critical paths not yet covered

  • workflow-execution-fan-out — Multi-file workflow execution fans out to file-processing workers and rejoins. (declared coverage: no groups declared)
✅ Covered critical paths
  • auth-login — covered by e2e-login
  • adapter-register-llm — covered by integration-backend
  • workflow-author — covered by integration-backend
  • co-owner-manage — covered by integration-backend, e2e-coowners
  • workflow-create-execute — covered by e2e-workflow
  • api-deployment-provision — covered by integration-backend
  • api-deployment-auth — covered by integration-backend
  • api-deployment-run — covered by e2e-api-deployment
  • mcp-server-auth — covered by integration-backend
  • mcp-platform-auth — covered by integration-backend
  • prompt-studio-author — covered by integration-backend
  • prompt-studio-fetch-response — covered by e2e-prompt-studio
  • connector-register-test — covered by integration-backend
  • pipeline-etl-execute — covered by e2e-etl
  • usage-aggregate-read — covered by integration-backend
  • usage-token-tracking — covered by e2e-api-deployment
  • callback-result-delivery — covered by e2e-api-deployment

@chandrasekharan-zipstack chandrasekharan-zipstack left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed at a8c940d. Nothing here blocks merge - the shape is right.

What is genuinely good, so it does not get lost in the nits:

  • Guard moved inside each sink, so a new caller cannot reach the network unchecked.
  • Parser agreement (urlparse vs urllib3.util.parse_url) as an invariant rather than a denylist of confusing characters - it holds as either parser changes.
  • is_global instead of enumerating is_private / is_reserved / etc. The old _is_safe_public_url missed 100.64.0.0/10 (RFC 6598 CGNAT), which belongs to none of those flags.
  • The inet_aton fallback in _as_ip closes a real bypass: under plain ipaddress.ip_address, http://2130706433/, 0177.0.0.1 and 127.1 all read as hostnames and got resolved. All three are 127.0.0.1 to the resolver.

Checked the fan-out: api_webhook, slack_webhook and webhook_provider all funnel through send_webhook_request, and format_failure_result(details=result) at workers/notification/providers/webhook_provider.py:162 does carry retryable through to the non-retryable shortcut at workers/notification/tasks.py:316. That three-hop contract works today, though it is implicit.

One follow-up outside this diff: workers/executor/executors/variable_replacement.py:170 - fetch_dynamic_variable_value posts to a tenant-supplied URL with no scheme check, no host check and redirects on. Same bug class as the two sinks fixed here, and the next _is_safe_public_url-shaped hole. Worth a ticket now that the shared helper exists.

Inline comments cover: the _validate_url simplification, the undeclared urllib3 dependency, the *.localhost subtree, DNS on the request thread, the inline import requests, and comment density.

Comment on lines +42 to +94
def _validate_url(self, data):
"""Reject webhook targets written as an internal address literal.

This is a convenience check, not the control. URLField only checks the
shape, so ``http://169.254.169.254/`` would otherwise save cleanly and
fail much later at the sink, out of the user's sight. Catching the
literal forms here turns the common mistake into a 400 at save time.

What it deliberately does not catch: ``resolve=False`` skips DNS, so a
*hostname* that points at an internal address — the majority of URLs —
is accepted here and refused at the sink. That is the intended split.
getaddrinfo honours no timeout, so resolving on the request thread
would let a slow or hostile resolver stall the worker serving it. The
sink resolves, and the sink is the real control.

Only checks a URL the caller actually sent. Re-resolving the stored one
would make an unrelated PATCH fail whenever DNS is briefly unavailable
or a legacy record predates this check.
"""
notification_type = data.get(
"notification_type", getattr(self.instance, "notification_type", None)
)
is_webhook = notification_type == NotificationType.WEBHOOK.value

if "url" not in data:
# A PATCH that does not touch the URL leaves the stored one alone.
# A create has nothing to leave alone: url is null=True on the
# model, so DRF makes it optional and a webhook would otherwise
# persist with no destination at all.
#
# Gate on the stored URL, not on `partial`: a webhook with no
# destination is invalid however it got that way — a create, a
# switch to WEBHOOK, or a legacy row being edited for something
# else. A row that already has a URL is untouched, which is what
# keeps the documented PATCH case working.
if is_webhook and not getattr(self.instance, "url", None):
raise serializers.ValidationError(
{"url": "A webhook notification requires a URL."}
)
return

url = data["url"]
if not url:
if is_webhook:
raise serializers.ValidationError(
{"url": "A webhook notification requires a URL."}
)
return

if not is_safe_webhook_url(url, resolve=False):
raise serializers.ValidationError(
{"url": "URL must not be an internal or ambiguous address."}
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

_validate_url collapses to ~9 lines of logic with identical behaviour, and it matches how _validate_api_or_pipeline / _validate_authorization just below already merge instance state.

Why the merge is safe:

  • data.get("url", instance.url) only falls back when the key is absent, so an explicit {"url": null} still yields None and still errors - the one case the two-branch form was guarding.
  • "" cannot reach validate(): the model field has no blank=True, so DRF sets allow_blank=False and the field errors first.
  • Keeping "url" in data on the safety check preserves the documented "don't re-check the stored URL" behaviour. Drop it and a legacy row holding http://10.0.0.1/ becomes un-PATCHable - including {"is_active": false} to switch it off.

Two related points on this method:

  • is_webhook is always true today. NotificationType has exactly one member and it is the model default, so both branches always raise. Fine to keep as a guard for a future EMAIL, but it is currently unexercised.
  • The required-URL rule is a behaviour change beyond SSRF - a webhook could previously be created with no URL and now gets a 400. Worth adding to the "Can this PR break any existing features" section, which lists three changes and not this one.
Suggested change
def _validate_url(self, data):
"""Reject webhook targets written as an internal address literal.
This is a convenience check, not the control. URLField only checks the
shape, so ``http://169.254.169.254/`` would otherwise save cleanly and
fail much later at the sink, out of the user's sight. Catching the
literal forms here turns the common mistake into a 400 at save time.
What it deliberately does not catch: ``resolve=False`` skips DNS, so a
*hostname* that points at an internal addressthe majority of URLs
is accepted here and refused at the sink. That is the intended split.
getaddrinfo honours no timeout, so resolving on the request thread
would let a slow or hostile resolver stall the worker serving it. The
sink resolves, and the sink is the real control.
Only checks a URL the caller actually sent. Re-resolving the stored one
would make an unrelated PATCH fail whenever DNS is briefly unavailable
or a legacy record predates this check.
"""
notification_type = data.get(
"notification_type", getattr(self.instance, "notification_type", None)
)
is_webhook = notification_type == NotificationType.WEBHOOK.value
if "url" not in data:
# A PATCH that does not touch the URL leaves the stored one alone.
# A create has nothing to leave alone: url is null=True on the
# model, so DRF makes it optional and a webhook would otherwise
# persist with no destination at all.
#
# Gate on the stored URL, not on `partial`: a webhook with no
# destination is invalid however it got that way — a create, a
# switch to WEBHOOK, or a legacy row being edited for something
# else. A row that already has a URL is untouched, which is what
# keeps the documented PATCH case working.
if is_webhook and not getattr(self.instance, "url", None):
raise serializers.ValidationError(
{"url": "A webhook notification requires a URL."}
)
return
url = data["url"]
if not url:
if is_webhook:
raise serializers.ValidationError(
{"url": "A webhook notification requires a URL."}
)
return
if not is_safe_webhook_url(url, resolve=False):
raise serializers.ValidationError(
{"url": "URL must not be an internal or ambiguous address."}
)
def _validate_url(self, data):
"""Reject internal address literals at save time; the sink is the real control.
resolve=False keeps DNS off the request thread - getaddrinfo takes no
timeout. A hostname pointing inward is accepted here, refused at the sink.
"""
notification_type = data.get(
"notification_type", getattr(self.instance, "notification_type", None)
)
url = data.get("url", getattr(self.instance, "url", None))
if not url:
if notification_type == NotificationType.WEBHOOK.value:
raise serializers.ValidationError(
{"url": "A webhook notification requires a URL."}
)
return
# Only a URL the caller actually sent - re-checking the stored one would
# 400 an unrelated PATCH on a legacy row.
if "url" in data and not is_safe_webhook_url(url, resolve=False):
raise serializers.ValidationError(
{"url": "URL must not be an internal or ambiguous address."}
)

Comment on lines +20 to +22
# Already present transitively via requests; declared because the egress
# guard imports it directly to match urllib3's host encoding.
"idna>=3.0",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ssrf.py imports urllib3.exceptions.LocationParseError and urllib3.util.parse_url directly, but only idna is declared. Same reasoning as the comment right here, so worth being consistent - otherwise a future requests that repins or drops urllib3 breaks the guard's import with nothing in this file to catch it.

Suggested change
# Already present transitively via requests; declared because the egress
# guard imports it directly to match urllib3's host encoding.
"idna>=3.0",
# Present transitively via requests; declared because the egress guard
# imports them directly.
"idna>=3.0",
"urllib3>=2.0",

# hostname is accepted here and caught at the sink.
if literal is not None and not _is_public(str(literal)):
return REFUSED_INTERNAL_LITERAL
if host in _LOOPBACK_NAMES:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

RFC 6761 reserves the whole localhost subtree, not just the apex, so http://api.localhost/hook passes this path today. The sink still catches it on resolution, so this is convenience-layer only - but _LOOPBACK_NAMES' comment claims RFC 6761 coverage, and this is the cheap half of it.

Suggested change
if host in _LOOPBACK_NAMES:
if host in _LOOPBACK_NAMES or host.endswith(".localhost"):

Comment on lines +1 to +33
"""Shared egress guard for user-supplied webhook URLs.

Both webhook sinks — prompt postprocessing and pipeline notifications — take a
URL from a tenant and hand it to ``requests``. This module is the single place
that decides whether such a URL may be dialled, so a new sink does not have to
carry its own copy of the rules.

Three things are checked, in the order the code runs them:

1. **Scheme and userinfo.** Anything outside the caller's allowlist is refused,
as is a URL carrying credentials.
2. **Parser agreement.** This module reads the URL with ``urllib.parse`` while
the transport underneath ``requests`` resolves it with ``urllib3``. The two
do not always agree on the host, and where they disagree the URL is refused,
because the host approved here is not the host the socket connects to.
Comparing the two parsers is an invariant rather than a list of characters to
reject, so it holds as either parser changes — provided both sides normalize
the same way, which is why ``_normalize_host`` mirrors urllib3's encoder
rather than reaching for the stdlib ``idna`` codec.
3. **Resolved address**, when ``resolve`` is set. Every address the host
resolves to must be publicly routable. Loopback, private, link-local (which
covers the cloud metadata endpoints), reserved and multicast ranges are all
refused.

Every refusal carries a reason. ``is_safe_webhook_url`` answers the yes/no
question and logs the reason; ``webhook_url_refusal`` returns it, so a sink can
tell a transient resolver failure (retryable) from a URL that will never be
allowed (not retryable).

Note the ceiling: resolve-then-connect cannot cover a name that is re-resolved
to an internal address between this check and the socket. The control for that
is an egress policy on the worker pods, not application code.
"""

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

General ask for the PR, anchored here because this file is where it shows most: keep code comments concise and generic - a short WHY that still reads correctly a year from now, to someone without the context of this review.

This module is 113 prose lines against 100 lines of code (24 comment + 89 docstring), in a 257-line file.

The per-function comments are the good kind and should stay - each one stops a reader from "simplifying" the line back into a bug:

  • _normalize_host on why the stdlib idna codec is not interchangeable (IDNA-2003 nameprep maps fass.de where the transport produces xn--fa-hia.de).
  • _as_ip on inet_aton accepting the legacy encodings the resolver accepts.
  • _is_public on is_global being a maintained allowlist, so 100.64.0.0/10 is not missed.

This module docstring is the other kind: a numbered walkthrough of what those three functions already document, plus a restatement of the PR description. It drifts the first time a check moves or is reordered, and then it actively misleads. Same pattern at _validate_url in serializers.py (18-line docstring over 25 lines of code) and the block comment at serializers.py:67-76, which explains a decision rather than the code.

Suggest trimming each down to the one or two facts that are not already visible from the code.

# Same guard as the delivery sinks. This endpoint is behind
# INTERNAL_SERVICE_API_KEY and not tenant-reachable, but it takes
# an arbitrary URL and so gets the same treatment.
if not is_safe_webhook_url(validated_data["url"]):

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note only, no change requested: this is the one call site running resolve=True on a Django request thread, which is exactly the stall _validate_url avoids with resolve=False (getaddrinfo honours no timeout, so a slow or hostile resolver holds the worker).

Unavoidable here - the endpoint actually dials the URL, so it has to resolve - and it sits behind INTERNAL_SERVICE_API_KEY. Just flagging that the concern documented in the serializer applies here unmitigated, in case a timeout-bounded resolver is worth it later.

status=status.HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST,
)

import requests

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pre-existing, but this hunk already touches the lines around it: move import requests to the top of the module. Project convention is imports at the top unless required for circular-dependency resolution, which is not the case here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants