Community guidelines - #2299
Conversation
…ommunity-gudelines
remove static icons, update the styles
…ommunity-guidelines # Conflicts: # package-lock.json # packages/stacks-docs/src/routes/[category]/+page.svelte
|
✅ Deploy Preview for stacks ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
Minor clean-up to conform to most recent version, as per CM department's copy
minor updates
* Update audiences.md Updated to latest version, with minor changes. * Update audiences.md; removed reference to "SE network"
|
@someobscurereference incorporated your #2309 PR (here), alt text and the extra bits. |
…ge/Stacks into community-guidelines
dancormier
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looking good 😎 I added commits with very minor conditional hardening, plus a couple language tweaks for more inclusive accessibility wording and clarity around meta site purpose/structure. Feel free to alter my changes as you see fit and merge when ready!
…ommunity-guidelines # Conflicts: # packages/stacks-docs/src/routes/+page.svelte
✅ Deploy Preview for stackoverflow-email ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
Chiming in on the information architecture here, my suggestion:
Notes on rationale and thinking — if you or my future self wants context Summary Community currently sits as its own top-level nav item, parallel to Copywriting. Both sections are fundamentally about how we write — Copywriting covers product/marketing copy (Tone of voice, Naming, Style guide, Patterns), Community covers writing to people on Meta (Audiences, Tone, Language & grammar, Terminology) — but nothing in the IA currently reflects that relationship. Problem
Proposed change Introduce a new top-level parent, Words, with Copywriting and Community as sibling sections underneath: Why a shared parent rather than nesting Community under Copywriting directly
Alternatives considered
Name options considered for new parent
|
|
@CGuindon I agree the IA could use some adjustment. I'd consider it out of scope for this PR but I've created STACKS-912 so we don't lose track of this work |


Introduces a new 'Community' section to Stacks to initially help writing on Meta.