Skip to content

gen/integration contracts - #528

Open
Skidamek wants to merge 34 commits into
gen/update-lifecyclefrom
gen/integration-contracts
Open

gen/integration contracts#528
Skidamek wants to merge 34 commits into
gen/update-lifecyclefrom
gen/integration-contracts

Conversation

@Skidamek

@Skidamek Skidamek commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

This PR makes the boundaries between generation storage, release flow, bootstrap, file lifecycle, and legacy loaders executable.

It adds generation checkpoints and compaction receipts. A patch-note-only publication creates a new generation even when the file manifest is unchanged. Object source resolution handles extensionless content-addressed files, and generated nested copies carry generation state. Release, deletion, overlay, quarantine, and history fixtures check the corresponding storage and lifecycle contracts.

Most of the change is integration coverage. The autotester exercises authenticated bootstrap and preload, release gates, deletion and content convergence, editable overlays, quarantine restore, installed-pack removal, nested mod copies, client and server compaction, and trust roots. Legacy Forge coverage checks metadata, bootstrap ownership, readiness, disconnect recovery, and cache deserialization. The layer also makes test artifacts reproducible.

Coverage

The contract tests cover both normal releases and the legacy loader paths used by the stack.

@Skidamek
Skidamek force-pushed the gen/integration-contracts branch from 6998245 to 543852a Compare August 20, 2026 11:12

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 69982454d4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/main/java/pl/skidam/automodpack/modpack/Commands.java
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant