Skip to content

chore: migrate HawkEye to v7 - #82

Open
tisonkun wants to merge 1 commit into
QuEraComputing:mainfrom
tisonkun:codex/migrate-hawkeye-v7
Open

chore: migrate HawkEye to v7#82
tisonkun wants to merge 1 commit into
QuEraComputing:mainfrom
tisonkun:codex/migrate-hawkeye-v7

Conversation

@tisonkun

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • migrate the HawkEye configuration and integration to v7
  • install HawkEye from its latest release without pinning the tool version
  • validate the migrated configuration with HawkEye v7 (82 files, 0 changes, 0 conflicts, 0 unsupported)
  • update the project link to the current fast/hawkeye repository
  • mise run license passes

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 22, 2026 12:22

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Migrates HawkEye license-header configuration and CI integration to v7.

Changes:

  • Updates configuration and template syntax.
  • Installs and runs HawkEye directly in CI.
  • Refreshes the HawkEye repository link.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
licenserc.toml Migrates configuration to HawkEye v7.
licenserc.header.txt Updates template syntax.
CONTRIBUTING.md Updates the HawkEye repository link.
.github/workflows/license-headers.yml Uses the HawkEye CLI in CI.
Suppressed comments (1)

.github/workflows/license-headers.yml:23

  • tool: hawkeye resolves the newest published release on every workflow run, so a future HawkEye release can change the config semantics or fail this v7-only migration without any repository change. The v7 integration guidance pins the tested binary (hawkeye@7.0.0); please pin that release and update it deliberately when migrating again.
          tool: hawkeye

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants