ENH: Made tool naming more consistent with rest of code base - #137
ENH: Made tool naming more consistent with rest of code base#137aylward wants to merge 13 commits into
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedToo many files! This PR contains 197 files, which is 97 over the limit of 100. To get a review, reduce the PR to 100 files or fewer by splitting it into smaller PRs or changing its base branch. Upgrade to a paid plan to raise the limit. This review couldn't start because sufficient usage credits or metered capacity aren't available. Add credits or update usage-based reviews in the billing tab, then retry. ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (197)
You can disable this status message by setting the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
…-neighbor exclusion, dropped the narrow opposite-face-only target that caused runaway cascade.
* clip_grad_norm_ before every optimizer.step(), bounded by new grad_clip_norm hyperparameter (default 1.0, tunable via set_grad_clip_norm()) — caps any single batch's step size, including the first_invariant term's unclamped gradient path. * Non-finite loss skip: if loss isn't finite, logs a warning with the epoch and loss value and continues past backward()/step() entirely — since gradient clipping can't fix an already-NaN gradient, this stops Adam's moment estimates from ever being poisoned in the first place.
No description provided.