Correct disposable card limit label - #15
Open
johnquevedo wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
johnquevedo
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 25, 2026 20:26
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Correct one BANKING77 test label:
how many transactions can i make with a disposable cardget_disposable_virtual_carddisposable_card_limitsbanking_data/test.csv, zero-based data row 2,637This PR changes no other dataset row.
Evidence
The source was pinned to publisher commit
57ec275d8078af65b7731c2a98be812d844a6d6b, which is also the currentmastercommit at the time of this PR.The wording asks about the number of permitted transactions. Closely matching
training rows are labeled
disposable_card_limits:Reproduction
From the repository root:
After this patch, the test file still parses to 3,080 rows and row 2,637 has
category
disposable_card_limits.Limitations
The repository does not publish a category annotation guide, so this proposal
relies on the utterance meaning and consistent labels of near-identical
training examples. Automated nearest-neighbor and character n-gram models
helped surface and cross-check the candidate, but their outputs are supporting
signals rather than proof. This PR intentionally excludes other uncertain
findings and makes no claim of significant downstream model improvement.