Skip to content

Customize whether the unit can be detected by psychic detector - #2364

Open
DeathFishAtEase wants to merge 3 commits into
Phobos-developers:developfrom
DeathFishAtEase:PsychicDetectable
Open

Customize whether the unit can be detected by psychic detector#2364
DeathFishAtEase wants to merge 3 commits into
Phobos-developers:developfrom
DeathFishAtEase:PsychicDetectable

Conversation

@DeathFishAtEase

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

What kind of change is this?

  • New feature, vanilla bugfix or enhancement of a released feature - changelog, docs and credits entries are needed.
  • Improvement to a new (unreleased) feature - docs and credits entries are needed; no changelog entry (Skip Changelog).
  • Bugfix to a new (unreleased) feature - credits entry is needed; no changelog or docs entries (Skip Changelog, Skip Docs).
  • Bugfix to an old (released) feature - changelog and credits entries are needed; no docs entry (Skip Docs).
  • Completely minor change (e.g. a typo fix) - no entries are needed (Skip Changelog, Skip Docs, Skip Credits).

Description

  • Now you can use the following flag to define whether the unit can be detected by buildings that have PsychicDetectionRadius.

In rulesmd.ini:

[SOMETECHNO]            ; TechnoType
PsychicDetectable=true  ; boolean

@DeathFishAtEase DeathFishAtEase self-assigned this Aug 22, 2026
@DeathFishAtEase DeathFishAtEase added Needs testing ⚙️T1 T1 maintainer review is sufficient ❓Unhardcoding / Customization Make something more tweakable labels Aug 22, 2026
@phoboscn-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

To Chinese users:
This pull request has been mentioned on Phobos CN. There might be relevant details there:

致中文用户:
此拉取请求已在 Phobos CN 上被提及。那里可能有相关详细信息:

https://www.phoboscn.top/t/topic/737/1

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Nightly build for this pull request:

This comment is automatic and is meant to allow guests to get latest nightly builds for this pull request without registering. It is updated on every successful build.

@Coronia
Coronia requested a review from NetsuNegi August 23, 2026 03:26

@NetsuNegi NetsuNegi left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs testing ⚙️T1 T1 maintainer review is sufficient ❓Unhardcoding / Customization Make something more tweakable

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants