INTENT-4: session-scoped registration + required_slots#45
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 38 minutes and 5 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Merge-ready (MERGEABLE, dev merged in). Template conformance: header present, RFC-2119 boilerplate present, §11 session-scoped registration section well-formed with sub-sections 11.1–11.5. Added: CHANGELOG entry for the §11 addition (normative content was added without one). |
ecba169 to
8fc2ac7
Compare
… class) Narrowed from the multi-spec union-slots PR to ovos-intent-1.md only, per the 1-file-1-PR rule. The INTENT-3 required_slots half moves to the INTENT-3 PR, the INTENT-4 payload field to the INTENT-4 PR (#45), and the orchestrator backstop to the PIPELINE-1 PR. - §5.5 — slot-consistency narrowed to .dialog only. A .intent file MAY now declare different slot sets across templates (union semantics); the engine extracts only the slots of the best-matching template. .dialog keeps the strict consistency rule. - §6.2 — engine obligation updated: verify a consistent slot set for .dialog training data; accept differing slot sets for .intent. - appendix/patterns.md §3.4 (non-normative) — authoring patterns for union slot sets and required_slots. This relaxes a prior constraint, so every previously-valid file stays valid: backwards-compatible. INTENT-1 is already V2 (the <name> inline-vocabulary token); this addition does not change the class, so the Version stays 2. Also drops the stray VERSIONING.md / ngi.png / README edits the original branch carried, which were unrelated to this change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
43128cd to
607d602
Compare
607d602 to
b32554b
Compare
Companion issue: #47
Summary
Every intent registration is automatically keyed by
session_idfromcontext.session.session_id— no wire-shape change needed."default"is the global/inherited scope; all sessions inherit it. Session-scoped registrations extend the pool; the existing blacklist fields are the sole narrowing mechanism.Effective pool for session X:
defaultintents ∪session-Xintents − blacklisted entriesDispatch of session-scoped intents routes back through the bridge transparently via existing MSG-1 destination-based routing (BRIDGE-1 §3.2).
Changes
(session_id, skill_id, intent_name, lang, method);session_idread fromcontext.session.session_id, never frommessage.dataovos.skill.deregistergains optionalsession_idfield for bulk satellite cleanup on disconnectovos.intent.listgains optionalsession_idfilter returning the effective pool (default ∪ session-specific); response entries includesession_idCompanion
BRIDGE-1 §4.4 (PR #43) documents the satellite skill registration pattern this spec enables.