Skip to content

Never break after operator#757

Open
wvpm wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
dev_never_break_after_operator
Open

Never break after operator#757
wvpm wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
dev_never_break_after_operator

Conversation

@wvpm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wvpm wvpm commented May 23, 2026

Original PR: #672
Stacked on top of #756

Never break after operators.
Operators are the most important signal of what the code does.
They should always be in sight and never at the end of a line like an afterthought.

@wvpm wvpm requested a review from a team as a code owner May 23, 2026 10:00
@wvpm wvpm added enhancement New feature or request topic:codestyle labels May 23, 2026
@wvpm wvpm changed the title Dev never break after operator [from dev] never break after operator May 23, 2026
@wvpm wvpm changed the title [from dev] never break after operator [from dev] Never break after operator May 23, 2026
@wvpm wvpm force-pushed the dev_never_break_after_operator branch from 8aea9d1 to f65fcc9 Compare May 23, 2026 18:27
@Spartan322 Spartan322 changed the title [from dev] Never break after operator Never break after operator May 23, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Spartan322 Spartan322 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aside from the fact I will never permit merge commits inside an approved PR, I also won't approve anything in regards to "not breaking after operators", formatters will be required and I am not accepting any compromise on that but I also don't remotely agree with this claim regarding operators, in fact I find the styling here, aside from the lack of formatting, atrocious and would be absolutely horrified to see this continued any further in the codebase, I will never approve this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request topic:codestyle

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants