Skip to content

docs(mimic-iii): SpO2 itemids for CareVue vs MetaVision (#1957) - #2154

Open
Chessing234 wants to merge 6 commits into
MIT-LCP:mainfrom
Chessing234:docs/spo2-neonatal-notes-1957
Open

docs(mimic-iii): SpO2 itemids for CareVue vs MetaVision (#1957)#2154
Chessing234 wants to merge 6 commits into
MIT-LCP:mainfrom
Chessing234:docs/spo2-neonatal-notes-1957

Conversation

@Chessing234

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Document why SpO2 queries using only 646 or only 220277 can return zero rows in mixed-era MIMIC-III cohorts (including neonates).
  • Link from READMEs; add count / stay-list helper SQL.
  • Clarify we will not ship a silent merged SpO2 derived table.

Test plan

Closes #1957

Made with Cursor

Chessing234 and others added 6 commits July 31, 2026 15:50
Answer MIT-LCP#1957: zero rows are often CareVue/MetaVision mix, not missing SpO2.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Surface MIT-LCP#1957 from module and repository entrypoints.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Home for MIT-LCP#1957 availability SQL outside derived concepts.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Give MIT-LCP#1957 reporters a concrete CareVue vs MetaVision check.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Help validate MIT-LCP#1957 cohorts before blaming missing pulse ox.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Keep MIT-LCP#1957 guidance as documentation, not a hidden ETL rewrite.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Spo2 availability in mimic iii

1 participant