Skip to content

📊 Refresh CIA data (0 CSVs + production stats)#3005

Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
data/cia-csv-refresh
Open

📊 Refresh CIA data (0 CSVs + production stats)#3005
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
data/cia-csv-refresh

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Automated CIA data refresh

Pulled the latest service.data.impl/sample-data/ CSVs from
Hack23/cia@master
(resolved to commit d01520d8ec89af2b20cf6c557b2f9af92ce64b91)
and re-ran the production-statistics pipeline against the same commit.

CSV refresh

Metric Count
Total tracked CSVs 146
✅ Updated 0
🟰 Unchanged 140
❔ Missing upstream 0
⏭ Skipped (local-only) 6
❌ Failed downloads 0

Production statistics

  • Total persons: 2499
  • Total votes: 3724917
  • Last extraction: 2026-06-06 20:48:04.446826

How resolution works

The workflow never introduces new files — it only refreshes CSVs
already tracked under data/cia/** and cia-data/**. Upstream paths
are resolved through a recursive basename → upstream-path index
built from the GitHub Tree API, so files living in
sub-folders (distinct_values/, framework-validation/,
risk-rule-tests/) are located correctly even though local paths
are organised differently. An <stem>_sample.csv alias is applied
for the handful of locally-renamed canonical files.

Review checklist

  • CSV diffs look reasonable (no schema regressions)
  • production-stats.json counts move monotonically or within reason
  • Dashboards still render with the refreshed data
  • No unexpected file additions or removals

Generated by .github/workflows/update-cia-csv-data.yml.

…01520d

- Upstream ref: master (resolved to d01520d8ec89af2b20cf6c557b2f9af92ce64b91)
- CSV files: updated 0 / 146 tracked
- Production stats: 2499 persons, 3724917 votes
- Last extraction: 2026-06-06 20:48:04.446826
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 21, 2026 05:12

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants