Add the Issues section the other repositories have - #34
Merged
Conversation
Ten of the sixteen Gryt repositories point people at the main repository for bugs and feature requests, in the same words. This one did not, so somebody looking for where to file lands on a repository with issues disabled and no sign of where they went. Same wording as everywhere else, in the same place, above Sponsors. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Documentation only, one section.
Most Gryt repositories carry a short
## Issuessection pointing at the mainrepository, in identical wording. This one didn't, so somebody looking for where
to file has nothing to go on.
Same words, same position — above
## Sponsors, as everywhere else.Part of a sweep across all sixteen repositories:
@gryt/coreand@gryt/cryptowere missing the house header entirely, and
reportswas missing Sponsors andspelled the licence section differently. Each is its own PR.
Branch named
readme-issues-sectionrather thanreadme-house-style, becausea stale branch of that name is still on this remote from an earlier pass. It
has no diff against main and is safe to delete.