SDKS-5192 Remove default configuration examples for reducing logcat overhead

[vibhorgoswami]

JIRA Ticket

SDKS-5192

Description

The logcat shows a lot of unnecessary errors when trying to resolve example domains.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Removed obsolete sample app configuration content from the bundled assets.
  • Streamlined the sample project by clearing out unused configuration files.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b719783e-ca30-4a66-bf84-dea6b35dd7c6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 75aad51 and 39b8106.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• samples/pingsampleapp/src/main/assets/DaVinciJsonConfig.json
• samples/pingsampleapp/src/main/assets/journeyJsonConfig.json
• samples/pingsampleapp/src/main/assets/openIdJsonConfig.json

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)

• samples/pingsampleapp/src/main/assets/DaVinciJsonConfig.json
• samples/pingsampleapp/src/main/assets/journeyJsonConfig.json
• samples/pingsampleapp/src/main/assets/openIdJsonConfig.json

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The sample app asset JSON configuration files were cleared or removed: DaVinciJsonConfig.json and openIdJsonConfig.json were emptied, and journeyJsonConfig.json was deleted.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Sample asset configuration cleanup samples/pingsampleapp/src/main/assets/DaVinciJsonConfig.json, samples/pingsampleapp/src/main/assets/journeyJsonConfig.json, samples/pingsampleapp/src/main/assets/openIdJsonConfig.json	Removed the JSON configuration contents from the sample app assets; one file was deleted and the other two were left empty.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• ForgeRock/ping-android-sdk#212: Adds the sample JSON config files that this PR removes.

Suggested reviewers

• spetrov
• witrisna

Poem

🐇 I hopped through the sample stash,
and found the config files made a splash.
One vanished, two went light and bare,
now quiet assets sit with air.
Tiny hops, and all is still.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly matches the change: removing default config examples to reduce logcat overhead.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description includes the JIRA ticket and a brief summary of the issue being addressed.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch SDKS-5192

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 44.41%. Comparing base (75aad51) to head (39b8106).

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop     #216      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      44.39%   44.41%   +0.02%     
  Complexity      1393     1393              
=============================================
  Files            316      316              
  Lines           9760     9760              
  Branches        1495     1495              
=============================================
+ Hits            4333     4335       +2     
  Misses          4863     4863              
+ Partials         564      562       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration-tests	28.59% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
unit-tests	26.03% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.