WS-AUTH-001-PREP: add prepared mutation authorization protocol#162
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a transaction-bound, single-use prepared authorization protocol with canonical locking, strict request/session binding, rollback semantics, API dependency wiring, PostgreSQL race tests, and documentation. No product consumer or migration is added. ChangesPrepared Authorization
Estimated code review effort: 4 (Complex) | ~60 minutes Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant PreparedAuthorizationService
participant AuthorizationService
participant PostgreSQL
Caller->>PreparedAuthorizationService: prepare(...)
PreparedAuthorizationService->>AuthorizationService: prelock authority
AuthorizationService->>PostgreSQL: lock canonical rows
PostgreSQL-->>AuthorizationService: locked facts
AuthorizationService-->>PreparedAuthorizationService: sealed authority
PreparedAuthorizationService-->>Caller: single-use handle
Caller->>PreparedAuthorizationService: consume(...)
PreparedAuthorizationService->>AuthorizationService: evaluate prelocked authority
AuthorizationService-->>Caller: AuthorizationDecision
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In
@.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/reviews/WS-AUTH-001-PREP-pr-trust-bundle.md:
- Around line 59-76: Clarify the external-review status in the “External Review
And Remaining Risks” section: do not present Agent Gates and CodeRabbit as
validating merge candidate 9e926d04511e04122beeb1f88110f80b88c34907 unless their
results are tied to that exact repaired SHA or run. Otherwise mark the exact-SHA
repair review and hosted Backend rerun as pending, while preserving the existing
fixture-repair risk details.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: d64c773b-4f76-491e-ae6e-cab19d25dc4b
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.agent-loop/REVIEW_LOG.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/reviews/WS-AUTH-001-PREP-external-review-response.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/reviews/WS-AUTH-001-PREP-internal-review-evidence.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/reviews/WS-AUTH-001-PREP-pr-trust-bundle.mdbackend/tests/test_authorization.py
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- backend/tests/test_authorization.py
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
…to codex/ws-auth-001-prep # Conflicts: # .agent-loop/REVIEW_LOG.md
WS-AUTH-001-PREP PR Trust Bundle
Chunk
WS-AUTH-001-PREP- Prepared Mutation Authorization Protocol (L1).Goal And Human-Approved Intent
Provide one kernel-owned, single-use authorization preparation protocol for
mutation services that must lock authority before locking and changing their
product resource. The user explicitly asked to plan and fix
consume()end toend, while keeping the full suite on GitHub because the local machine is slow.
What Changed And Why
single-use handle.
facts, seal authority to the exact service/session/root transaction, and
register the only valid consumption capability.
product lock; one shared AUTH completion path records the canonical decision
and evidence. The participant command retains ownership of durable
idempotency.
stages or commits product state itself.
orders, replay/forgery/substitution attacks, transaction failures, timeouts,
cancellation, and the sole eligible administrative grant invariant.
This protocol was chosen to preserve the established authority-first lock
order without handing callers reusable or caller-constructed authorization
facts. A serializable token, public prelocked context, caller-provided grant,
or second authorization path would weaken the trust boundary and was rejected.
Scope And Product Behavior
The chunk adds authorization infrastructure and tests only. It activates no
planned action, changes no permission or role, adds no route-level product
consumer, performs no product mutation, and adds no migration. Ordinary
require()behavior remains unchanged.Acceptance Proof And Test Delta
modules.
failures, authorization denial, evidence failure, timeout, cancellation,
double consumption, supported lifecycle/admin races in both lock orders, and
database enforcement of the sole eligible grant invariant.
removed or weakened. GitHub Backend remains the authoritative full-suite gate
for the 78 percent global and 90 percent changed-subsystem floors.
Internal Review And CI Integrity
Final reviewed sync SHA
6c1e296fca8390aeeed9f5bdf63b649a783c5030, containingimplementation
38acb8f91d3ddd2edd4cc26fb1e36b67fa130fd9, against trusted mainc12ba1c8d4bbde86d0e2c19826f5791afc130489passes senior engineering,QA/test, security/auth, product/ops, architecture, CI integrity, docs,
reuse/dedup, and test-delta review after safety repairs and trusted-main sync.
No CI configuration, coverage threshold, dependency, or migration changed.
External Review And Remaining Risks
GitHub Backend, Agent Gates, and CodeRabbit remain pending until publication.
The primary remaining risk is an unforeseen transaction/cancellation behavior
under the hosted PostgreSQL matrix; the full hosted suite is the required gate.
Product integration risk is intentionally deferred because this chunk has no
consumer.
Follow-Up And Human Review Focus
The same-initiative successor is
WS-AUTH-001-10, Project Qualification AndContributor Role Grants. Human review should focus on the service-private
consumer capability, exact context/root-transaction binding, authority-first
lock order, terminal handle invalidation, cancellation rollback, real-service
race proof, absence of a product consumer/migration, and the database-backed
sole-grant invariant.
Human Merge Ownership
The agent may publish and repair this branch but may not merge it. Only the
human may approve this PR for merge. Trusted-main automation owns signed
post-merge memory generation.
Summary by CodeRabbit