WS-CON-001-01: Adopt canonical contribution and compensation contract#144
Merged
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (15)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis documentation-only change establishes the canonical contribution and compensation specification with ADR 0016, updates related data-model and conformance documentation, records initiative review evidence, and adds a merge intent. Runtime, CI, tests, dependencies, and archival inputs remain unchanged. ChangesCanonical contribution compensation boundary
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~25 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In
@.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CON-001-contribution-compensation-boundary/CONFORMANCE_MATRIX.md:
- Line 6: Update the “Adapter binding” row in CONFORMANCE_MATRIX.md to remove
“matching policy/award references” from the binding requirements. State instead
that policy definitions and awards must reference a binding with matching
project and instrument identity, without modeling policy or award identifiers on
the binding aggregate.
In `@docs/spec_contribution_compensation.md`:
- Around line 336-340: Clarify the receipt redaction vocabulary in
docs/spec_contribution_compensation.md lines 336-340 by prohibiting raw provider
secrets, authentication tokens, and unbounded provider payloads while explicitly
allowing bounded opaque event/reference identifiers required by receipts. Apply
the same raw-versus-bounded terminology to D19 in
docs/decision_0016_contribution_compensation_boundary.md lines 288-293.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 52d1c10c-3fdc-4293-80b9-846cf5967af1
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CON-001-contribution-compensation-boundary/ACTIVE_DOC_INVENTORY.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CON-001-contribution-compensation-boundary/CHUNK_MAP.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CON-001-contribution-compensation-boundary/CONFORMANCE_MATRIX.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CON-001-contribution-compensation-boundary/DECISIONS.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CON-001-contribution-compensation-boundary/STATUS.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CON-001-contribution-compensation-boundary/reviews/WS-CON-001-01-internal-review-evidence.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CON-001-contribution-compensation-boundary/reviews/WS-CON-001-01-pr-trust-bundle.md.agent-loop/merge-intents/WS-CON-001-01.jsonREADME.mddocs/architecture_data_model.mddocs/decision_0016_contribution_compensation_boundary.mddocs/spec_contribution_compensation.md
abiorh-claw
self-requested a review
July 17, 2026 23:47
abiorh-claw
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Trust Bundle: WS-CON-001-01
Chunk
WS-CON-001-01- Canonical Contract Adoption And Architecture DecisionRisk: L0 direction executed as L1 specification work; SLA P1.
Goal
Publish one repository-owned contribution/compensation specification and ADR
0016, reconciled with merged AUTH, REV, ART, and WS-XINT boundaries, without
changing runtime or archival inputs.
Human-Approved Intent
The human approved the reconciled WS-CON plan, accept-only
Review -> FinalAcceptance -> accepted_submission, ContributionPolicysuperseding the retired economic model, no v0.1 adjudication, and explicit start
of this chunk.
What Changed
evidence, and one merge intent.
Why It Changed
The archival input and old runtime-oriented chunk documents did not reflect
merged FinalAcceptance, AUTH custody/prepared mutation, optional ART evidence,
dispatcher/handler separation, or the joint release fence. One active contract
is required before schema/runtime chunks proceed.
Design Chosen
FinalAcceptance and submitter recognition.
operations; REV stages audit/outbox and the caller commits once.
22 mappings remain non-final proposals.
NUMERIC(38, 18)and receipts store only bounded, minimizedcanonical facts.
Alternatives Rejected
Scope Control
Changed files are limited to canonical docs, README precedence, the active
data-model correction, WS-CON initiative artifacts, and exactly one merge
intent. No backend, migration, AUTH/ART/REV-owned runtime contract, workflow,
dependency, test, coverage, or roadmap/export file changed.
The user-owned deleted reference PDF was not staged or committed.
Product Behavior
Runtime behavior is unchanged. The documents define target behavior and keep
all routes hidden until implementation, AUTH activation, and joint release.
Acceptance Criteria Proof
authorization, adapter, and release contracts are defined.
and no adjudication match merged REV.
/api/v1, secret exclusion, conformance mapping, and archive preservation areexplicit.
Tests And Checks Run
All passed; agent gates reported 80 tests passed. Both present archival hashes
matched, the committed reference-spec diff was empty, and the mapping count was
exactly 22.
Test Delta
No tests, scanners, test configuration, or coverage thresholds changed. The
existing tests were run unchanged.
CI Integrity
No workflow, package script, dependency, lint/typecheck command, test runner, or
coverage threshold changed. CI-integrity review passed.
Reviewer Results
Exact reviewed SHA:
0b663f38b4a8fc7058e4e71932d72571d2cc2b6a.All valid findings were repaired and all tracks passed at the exact SHA with no
remaining findings. No sub-agent session remains open.
External Review
Pending GitHub CI, CodeRabbit, and human PR review. They supplement but do not
replace the completed internal tracks.
Remaining Risks
unimplemented and must refresh from trusted main per chunk.
Follow-Up Work
The same-initiative successor is
WS-CON-001-02A, shared transactional outboxpersistence. It requires a separate explicit start after this PR merges. This
chunk does not start it.
Human Review Focus
Human Merge Ownership
Only the human owner may approve and merge the specific PR. Passing reviewers,
CI, or CodeRabbit do not authorize merge or the next chunk.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation