Skip to content

Fix mixed group export selection#96133

Draft
ShridharGoel wants to merge 1 commit into
Expensify:mainfrom
ShridharGoel:shridhar-fix-mixed-group-export-643662
Draft

Fix mixed group export selection#96133
ShridharGoel wants to merge 1 commit into
Expensify:mainfrom
ShridharGoel:shridhar-fix-mixed-group-export-643662

Conversation

@ShridharGoel

@ShridharGoel ShridharGoel commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Fixes mixed group exports so the App sends collapsed groups and individually selected expenses separately.

The grouped query now contains only groups that were selected as groups. Individually selected expenses are sent through transactionIDList, together with isGroupExport: true, so Auth can combine both selections without exporting the individual expense's full group.

This depends on:

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/643662
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Use the linked Auth and Web-E branches in Expensidev.
  2. Open an expense search and group it by member.
  3. Expand group A, which must contain more than one expense.
  4. Select only the first expense in group A.
  5. Select another group B while it is collapsed.
  6. Export the current view as CSV.
  7. Verify the CSV contains only the selected expense from group A and every expense from group B.
  8. Verify the other expenses from group A are not exported.
  9. Verify the groups follow the selected sort order.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. Repeat steps 2–5 above.
  2. Go offline and try to export.
  3. Verify the offline message appears and no export request is sent.
  4. Go online and verify the export succeeds.

QA Steps

Same as tests.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

This is the result after selecting the full group "Benefits" and a single expense from the group "Advertising":

Screenshot 2026-07-15 at 8 17 49 PM

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/libs/actions/Search.ts 40.03% <ø> (ø)
src/hooks/useSearchBulkActions.ts 53.96% <0.00%> (+0.11%) ⬆️
... and 12 files with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant