feat(cms): add public read access and draft mode support - #35
Open
jlorion wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
- add `anyone` access control function with draft-token bypass for unpublished/draft documents - generate and wire up CMS_DRAFT_SECRET_TOKEN for draft mode auth - add custom /durianpy-website-types endpoint to sync only relevant collection types to the website repo
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📝 Overview
What does this PR do? Briefly describe the changes and the goal of this PR.
🚀 Type of Change
🧱 CMS & Database Changes
Skip this section if no CMS or database changes were made.
payload migrate:createand saved the file.📊 Data Structure
Describe the new fields/tables or drag-and-drop a screenshot here:
🧪 Testing & Validation
📸 Visual Evidence (Mandatory)
Important
Visual proof is required to demonstrate that the approved test cases from the issue were successfully met.
Please provide screenshots, screen recordings (GIFs/Videos), or sample API outputs proving that the feature satisfies all approved test cases and do not introduce regressions.
cms client
type sync
collection with draft
collection without draft
📋 Final Checklist
mainand resolved conflicts.🧠 Extra Notes / Questions
Add any additional context or questions for the reviewers here.