Skip to content

feat(shared-runtime)!: SharedRuntime Borrowed & Owned mode#2061

Open
Aaalibaba42 wants to merge 13 commits into
mainfrom
jwiriath/shared-runtime-mods
Open

feat(shared-runtime)!: SharedRuntime Borrowed & Owned mode#2061
Aaalibaba42 wants to merge 13 commits into
mainfrom
jwiriath/shared-runtime-mods

Conversation

@Aaalibaba42

@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What ?

Split SharedRuntime into a trait with three implementations:

  • ForkSafeRuntime (native only): owns a multi-thread tokio runtime, supports fork
    hooks (before_fork / after_fork_parent / after_fork_child) and synchronous
    shutdown.
  • BasicRuntime (native only): wraps a library-built or caller-provided
    Arc<tokio::runtime::Runtime>, no fork hooks, no synchronous shutdown.
  • LocalRuntime (wasm32 only): single-threaded executor that spawns workers via
    wasm_bindgen_futures::spawn_local, no fork protocol, async-only.

BlockingRuntime (native only) is a sub-trait of SharedRuntime that adds
block_on; implemented by ForkSafeRuntime and BasicRuntime. Sync facades on the
trace exporter (send / shutdown / build) bound their runtime parameter on it.

TraceExporter is generic over the runtime — TraceExporter<C, R: SharedRuntime>
— so callers pick ForkSafeRuntime, BasicRuntime, or LocalRuntime explicitly. The
FFI pins R = ForkSafeRuntime for ABI stability.

Why ?

Some callers already have a tokio runtime they want to reuse instead of letting
libdatadog create its own. The previous SharedRuntime only supported the
fork-safe owned case. Splitting into distinct types makes the lifecycle and
fork-safety contract explicit and lets callers pick the model that matches their
environment.

The wasm32 target previously shared a file with the native implementation behind
#[cfg] walls; it is now a dedicated module with a clean separation.

How ?

  • Introduce a SharedRuntime trait (new, spawn_worker, shutdown_async).
  • Add a native-only BlockingRuntime: SharedRuntime sub-trait with block_on.
  • Move the existing owned-runtime logic into ForkSafeRuntime; fork hooks and sync
    shutdown are inherent methods (not part of the trait).
  • Add BasicRuntime::with_worker_threads (library-built) and
    BasicRuntime::from_handle(Arc<Runtime>) (caller-provided).
  • Extract the wasm32 spawn_local path from fork_safe.rs into its own
    local.rs module as LocalRuntime.
  • Make TraceExporter<C, R> and TraceExporterBuilder<R> generic over the runtime;
    sync entry points additionally require R: BlockingRuntime. Default for the
    builder is impl'd only for R = ForkSafeRuntime on native so
    TraceExporterBuilder::default() resolves unambiguously.
  • restart_on_fork = true is silently ignored (with a warn!) on BasicRuntime
    and LocalRuntime since they do not implement a fork protocol.
  • Update FFI to pin R = ForkSafeRuntime in its TraceExporter type alias.

Additional Notes

  • Breaking change for Rust callers of libdd_shared_runtime: SharedRuntime is
    now a trait; use ForkSafeRuntime::with_worker_threads(1) (or the trait method
    SharedRuntime::new() with the trait in scope) instead of SharedRuntime::new().
  • FFI handle type changes from SharedRuntime to ForkSafeRuntime.

@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 29, 2026 14:03
@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 force-pushed the jwiriath/shared-runtime-mods branch from b0f4da8 to 50536ba Compare May 29, 2026 14:06
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📚 Documentation Check Results

⚠️ 4080 documentation warning(s) found

📦 libdd-data-pipeline-ffi - 1250 warning(s)

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 1139 warning(s)

📦 libdd-shared-runtime-ffi - 195 warning(s)

📦 libdd-shared-runtime - 188 warning(s)

📦 libdd-telemetry - 508 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-stats - 800 warning(s)


Updated: 2026-06-19 11:50:53 UTC | Commit: 436d01e | missing-docs job results

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 13d5a971de

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/borrowed.rs Outdated
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Clippy Allow Annotation Report

Comparing clippy allow annotations between branches:

  • Base Branch: origin/main
  • PR Branch: origin/jwiriath/shared-runtime-mods

Summary by Rule

Rule Base Branch PR Branch Change
unwrap_used 19 19 No change (0%)
Total 19 19 No change (0%)

Annotation Counts by File

File Base Branch PR Branch Change
libdd-data-pipeline/src/telemetry/mod.rs 1 1 No change (0%)
libdd-data-pipeline/src/trace_buffer/mod.rs 1 1 No change (0%)
libdd-data-pipeline/src/trace_exporter/mod.rs 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-telemetry/src/worker/mod.rs 14 14 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-stats/src/stats_exporter.rs 1 1 No change (0%)

Annotation Stats by Crate

Crate Base Branch PR Branch Change
clippy-annotation-reporter 5 5 No change (0%)
datadog-ffe-ffi 1 1 No change (0%)
datadog-ipc 22 22 No change (0%)
datadog-live-debugger 4 4 No change (0%)
datadog-live-debugger-ffi 10 10 No change (0%)
datadog-profiling-replayer 4 4 No change (0%)
datadog-sidecar 45 45 No change (0%)
libdd-common 13 13 No change (0%)
libdd-common-ffi 12 12 No change (0%)
libdd-data-pipeline 5 5 No change (0%)
libdd-ddsketch 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-dogstatsd-client 1 1 No change (0%)
libdd-profiling 13 13 No change (0%)
libdd-remote-config 3 3 No change (0%)
libdd-telemetry 20 20 No change (0%)
libdd-tinybytes 4 4 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-normalization 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-obfuscation 3 3 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-stats 1 1 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-utils 11 11 No change (0%)
Total 181 181 No change (0%)

About This Report

This report tracks Clippy allow annotations for specific rules, showing how they've changed in this PR. Decreasing the number of these annotations generally improves code quality.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

⚠️ 26 issue(s) found, showing only errors (advisories, bans, sources)

📦 libdd-data-pipeline-ffi - 5 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:226:1
    │
226 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.0.1
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:253:1
    │
253 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:253:1
    │
253 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:253:1
    │
253 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:295:1
    │
295 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
                  └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v36.0.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 5 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:218:1
    │
218 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.0.1
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:245:1
    │
245 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:245:1
    │
245 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:245:1
    │
245 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:286:1
    │
286 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-shared-runtime-ffi - 4 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:87:1
   │
87 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
   ├ rand v0.8.5
     └── (dev) libdd-common v4.2.0
         ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
         │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
         │       └── libdd-shared-runtime-ffi v36.0.0
         └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:100:1
    │
100 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │       └── libdd-shared-runtime-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:100:1
    │
100 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │       └── libdd-shared-runtime-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:100:1
    │
100 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │       └── libdd-shared-runtime-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-shared-runtime - 4 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:73:1
   │
73 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
   ├ rand v0.8.5
     └── (dev) libdd-common v4.2.0
         ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
         │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
         └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:86:1
   │
86 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
   ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
     
     Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
     
     Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
     
     This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
   ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
     ├── rustls v0.23.37
     │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
     │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
     │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
     │   │       │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
     │   │       └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
     │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
     │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
     │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
     │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
     │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
     └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:86:1
   │
86 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
   ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
     
     This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
     This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
     
     Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
     
     This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
   ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
     ├── rustls v0.23.37
     │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
     │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
     │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
     │   │       │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
     │   │       └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
     │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
     │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
     │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
     │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
     │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
     └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:86:1
   │
86 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
   ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
     or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
     `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
     
     This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
     
     Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
     
     Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
   ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
     ├── rustls v0.23.37
     │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
     │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
     │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
     │   │       │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
     │   │       └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
     │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
     │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
     │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
     │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
     │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
     └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-telemetry - 4 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:163:1
    │
163 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      └── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.0.1
          └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:179:1
    │
179 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:179:1
    │
179 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:179:1
    │
179 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-trace-stats - 4 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:193:1
    │
193 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── (dev) libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.0.1
      │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:220:1
    │
220 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:220:1
    │
220 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:220:1
    │
220 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

Updated: 2026-06-19 11:51:58 UTC | Commit: 436d01e | dependency-check job results

@datadog-prod-us1-5

datadog-prod-us1-5 Bot commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tests

🎉 All green!

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 93.82%
Overall Coverage: 73.90% (+0.07%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: a0c98a9 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 force-pushed the jwiriath/shared-runtime-mods branch 2 times, most recently from 64603e7 to 4e49301 Compare May 29, 2026 14:22
@Aaalibaba42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 4e49301fa3

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/borrowed.rs Outdated
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 93.95085% with 32 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 73.57%. Comparing base (a76412c) to head (61fbe96).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2061      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.47%   73.57%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         475      477       +2     
  Lines       78999    79219     +220     
==========================================
+ Hits        58048    58283     +235     
+ Misses      20951    20936      -15     
Components Coverage Δ
libdd-crashtracker 65.34% <ø> (ø)
libdd-crashtracker-ffi 37.68% <ø> (ø)
libdd-agent-client 83.79% <ø> (ø)
libdd-alloc 98.77% <ø> (ø)
libdd-data-pipeline 86.07% <96.55%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
libdd-data-pipeline-ffi 73.02% <0.00%> (ø)
libdd-common 79.93% <ø> (ø)
libdd-common-ffi 74.41% <ø> (ø)
libdd-telemetry 73.37% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
libdd-telemetry-ffi 31.36% <ø> (ø)
libdd-dogstatsd-client 82.64% <ø> (ø)
datadog-ipc 76.36% <ø> (ø)
libdd-profiling 81.70% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
libdd-profiling-ffi 64.79% <ø> (ø)
libdd-sampling 97.41% <ø> (ø)
datadog-sidecar 36.14% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
datdog-sidecar-ffi 10.31% <ø> (ø)
spawn-worker 48.86% <ø> (ø)
libdd-tinybytes 93.80% <ø> (ø)
libdd-trace-normalization 81.71% <ø> (ø)
libdd-trace-obfuscation 87.30% <ø> (ø)
libdd-trace-protobuf 68.25% <ø> (ø)
libdd-trace-utils 89.30% <ø> (ø)
libdd-tracer-flare 86.57% <ø> (ø)
libdd-log 74.83% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Artifact Size Benchmark Report

aarch64-alpine-linux-musl
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 84.00 MB 84.05 MB +.06% (+53.21 KB) 🔍
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 7.76 MB 7.76 MB -0% (-24 B) 👌
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 10.36 MB 10.36 MB +.01% (+1.78 KB) 🔍
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 95.08 MB 95.14 MB +.05% (+53.20 KB) 🔍
libdatadog-x64-windows
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 24.83 MB 24.83 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 87.33 KB 87.33 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 180.85 MB 181.16 MB +.17% (+320.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 928.11 MB 929.34 MB +.13% (+1.22 MB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 8.10 MB 8.10 MB +0% (+512 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 87.33 KB 87.33 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 23.97 MB 23.98 MB +.03% (+8.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 47.83 MB 47.85 MB +.03% (+18.75 KB) 🔍
libdatadog-x86-windows
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 21.52 MB 21.52 MB +0% (+512 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 88.71 KB 88.71 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 184.83 MB 185.16 MB +.17% (+336.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 916.33 MB 917.53 MB +.13% (+1.19 MB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 6.25 MB 6.26 MB +0% (+512 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 88.71 KB 88.71 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 25.70 MB 25.71 MB +.03% (+8.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 45.48 MB 45.50 MB +.04% (+19.26 KB) 🔍
x86_64-alpine-linux-musl
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 74.88 MB 74.93 MB +.06% (+51.59 KB) 🔍
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 8.61 MB 8.61 MB -0% (-32 B) 👌
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 90.29 MB 90.34 MB +.05% (+51.03 KB) 🔍
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 10.47 MB 10.48 MB +.01% (+1.75 KB) 🔍

@VianneyRuhlmann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It looks like the description is a bit off mentioning fixes and bugs that seem to be coming from previous commits of the branch and not from the current state of the feature

@Aaalibaba42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

It looks like the description is a bit off mentioning fixes and bugs that seem to be coming from previous commits of the branch and not from the current state of the feature

I tried letting a cheap AI read the commits and make a description, I don't think it's too valuable and can even be detrimental, as it were.

@Aaalibaba42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I rewrote it cleaner and straighter to the point

@yannham yannham left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code LGTM overall, but I'm not entirely sure to fully grasp in which context (sync or async) is this API supposed to be consumed. In particular we use standard sync thread mechanisms (condvars, mutexes) in an async context, which could be problematic (even in a multi-thread context, a condvar will block the current executor thread, which is not ideal).

On a different front, I remember @paullegranddc said he would rather spawn our own shared runtime in a separate thread than hooking in the client's runtime. I don't have a strong opinion myself, but I wonder if this discussion had a conclusion.

Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/borrowed.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/borrowed.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/borrowed.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/borrowed.rs Outdated
@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 force-pushed the jwiriath/shared-runtime-mods branch from df92857 to 9d305e7 Compare June 5, 2026 11:00
@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 5, 2026 11:00
@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 changed the title feat(shared-runtime)!: add BorrowedRuntime for caller-owned tokio runtimes feat(shared-runtime)!: SharedRuntime Borrowed & Owned mode Jun 5, 2026
@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 force-pushed the jwiriath/shared-runtime-mods branch from 9d305e7 to 6b5b4db Compare June 5, 2026 11:35
Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/fork_safe.rs
@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 force-pushed the jwiriath/shared-runtime-mods branch from 6b5b4db to 5b21367 Compare June 5, 2026 11:56
@Aaalibaba42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Since the implementation was overhauled, I'll just resolve past conversations here, as they don't fit the current implementation.

@yannham yannham left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a few remarks but otherwise looks good (only skimmed through the native implementation, as I suppose it's just the original shared runtime moved)👍

Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/basic.rs
Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/borrowed.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/mod.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/fork_safe.rs
Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/owned.rs Outdated
@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 force-pushed the jwiriath/shared-runtime-mods branch from ff3c135 to eb913a1 Compare June 8, 2026 11:25
@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 force-pushed the jwiriath/shared-runtime-mods branch from eb913a1 to ccae7a5 Compare June 9, 2026 11:29
Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/borrowed.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/borrowed.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/mod.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/mod.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/fork_safe.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/owned.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/fork_safe.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/owned.rs Outdated
@Aaalibaba42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

As it is currently, I don't like how wasm is handled. Sementically it's attached to the ForkSafeRuntime, which is straight up a lie, but changing that would likely require a new implementer of the SharedRuntime trait. I'll sleep on it I'm not sure of the best design

@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 force-pushed the jwiriath/shared-runtime-mods branch from 0517c21 to 9fffdcb Compare June 17, 2026 11:46
@Aaalibaba42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 9fffdcbe44

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread libdd-shared-runtime/src/shared_runtime/basic.rs Outdated
@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 force-pushed the jwiriath/shared-runtime-mods branch from f292e28 to 10554e2 Compare June 17, 2026 12:35
@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 force-pushed the jwiriath/shared-runtime-mods branch from 890b2ff to a91e5c7 Compare June 19, 2026 11:35

@Eldolfin Eldolfin left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nits

pub struct DefaultExport<C, R>
where
C: HttpClientCapability + SleepCapability + MaybeSend + Sync + 'static,
R: SharedRuntime + std::fmt::Debug + Send + Sync + 'static,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
R: SharedRuntime + std::fmt::Debug + Send + Sync + 'static,
R: SharedRuntime,

Is there a reason to not make the SharedRuntime trait require these other trait itself ? Given that all 3 implementors already satisfy std::fmt::Debug + Send + Sync + 'static, I feel like this makes more sense

The trait definition could look like this:

pub trait SharedRuntime: std::fmt::Debug + Send + Sync + 'static {

Also applies to HttpClientCapability.

Comment on lines +86 to +89
warn!(
"restart_on_fork is ignored on BasicRuntime: regular mode is not fork-safe; \
use ForkSafeRuntime if you need fork hooks"
);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems the kind of place a panic would be more appropriate for me: it's a developer error not a end-user configuration issue.
It should never happen for a end-user if the issue is spotted by the developer that misused libdatadog, and a panic is harder to miss than a warning.

Comment on lines 9 to +27
//! A shared tokio runtime for running background workers across multiple components.
//!
//! This crate provides [`SharedRuntime`], which owns a single tokio runtime and manages
//! [`PausableWorker`]s on it. Components such as the trace exporter can share one runtime
//! instead of each creating their own, reducing thread and resource overhead.
//! This crate provides three implementations of [`SharedRuntime`], distinguished by their
//! threading model and fork-safety guarantees:
//!
//! [`SharedRuntime`] also provides fork-safety hooks (`before_fork`, `after_fork_parent`,
//! `after_fork_child`) that pause and restart workers around `fork()` calls, preventing
//! deadlocks in child processes.
//! - [`ForkSafeRuntime`] *(native only)* — owns a multi-thread tokio runtime and exposes the full
//! fork protocol ([`ForkSafeRuntime::before_fork`] / [`ForkSafeRuntime::after_fork_parent`] /
//! [`ForkSafeRuntime::after_fork_child`]) that pauses and restarts workers around `fork()` calls,
//! preventing deadlocks in child processes. Also provides synchronous
//! [`ForkSafeRuntime::block_on`] and [`ForkSafeRuntime::shutdown`].
//! - [`BasicRuntime`] *(native only)* — the regular (non-fork-safe) variant. Its internal tokio
//! runtime can be library-built ([`BasicRuntime::new`] / [`BasicRuntime::with_worker_threads`])
//! or supplied by the caller as an `Arc<tokio::runtime::Runtime>`
//! ([`BasicRuntime::from_handle`]).
//! - [`LocalRuntime`] *(wasm32 only)* — single-threaded local executor; spawns workers via
//! `wasm_bindgen_futures::spawn_local`. No fork protocol, no `block_on`, async-only.
//!
//! Components such as the trace exporter can share one runtime instead of each creating their
//! own, reducing thread and resource overhead.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
//! A shared tokio runtime for running background workers across multiple components.
//!
//! This crate provides [`SharedRuntime`], which owns a single tokio runtime and manages
//! [`PausableWorker`]s on it. Components such as the trace exporter can share one runtime
//! instead of each creating their own, reducing thread and resource overhead.
//! This crate provides three implementations of [`SharedRuntime`], distinguished by their
//! threading model and fork-safety guarantees:
//!
//! [`SharedRuntime`] also provides fork-safety hooks (`before_fork`, `after_fork_parent`,
//! `after_fork_child`) that pause and restart workers around `fork()` calls, preventing
//! deadlocks in child processes.
//! - [`ForkSafeRuntime`] *(native only)* — owns a multi-thread tokio runtime and exposes the full
//! fork protocol ([`ForkSafeRuntime::before_fork`] / [`ForkSafeRuntime::after_fork_parent`] /
//! [`ForkSafeRuntime::after_fork_child`]) that pauses and restarts workers around `fork()` calls,
//! preventing deadlocks in child processes. Also provides synchronous
//! [`ForkSafeRuntime::block_on`] and [`ForkSafeRuntime::shutdown`].
//! - [`BasicRuntime`] *(native only)* — the regular (non-fork-safe) variant. Its internal tokio
//! runtime can be library-built ([`BasicRuntime::new`] / [`BasicRuntime::with_worker_threads`])
//! or supplied by the caller as an `Arc<tokio::runtime::Runtime>`
//! ([`BasicRuntime::from_handle`]).
//! - [`LocalRuntime`] *(wasm32 only)* — single-threaded local executor; spawns workers via
//! `wasm_bindgen_futures::spawn_local`. No fork protocol, no `block_on`, async-only.
//!
//! Components such as the trace exporter can share one runtime instead of each creating their
//! own, reducing thread and resource overhead.
//! A shared tokio runtime for running background workers across multiple components.
//!
//! Components such as the trace exporter can share one runtime instead of each creating their
//! own, reducing thread and resource overhead.
//!
//! # Choosing a runtime
//!
//! | Runtime | Target | Threads | Fork-safe | `block_on` | When to use |
//! |---------------------|--------|---------|---------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
//! | [`ForkSafeRuntime`] | native | multi | yes — full protocol | yes | Default for native code that may run in a forking process (e.g. Ruby, Python runtimes). |
//! | [`BasicRuntime`] | native | multi | no | yes | Native code where `fork()` is not a concern; optionally share an existing `Arc<tokio::runtime::Runtime>` via [`BasicRuntime::from_handle`]. |
//! | [`LocalRuntime`] | wasm32 | single | n/a | no | WebAssembly; spawns via `wasm_bindgen_futures::spawn_local`. |
//!
//! ## Fork protocol ([`ForkSafeRuntime`] only)
//!
//! Call these around every `fork()` to prevent deadlocks in child processes:
//!
//! 1. [`ForkSafeRuntime::before_fork`] — pauses workers
//! 2. `fork()`
//! 3. parent: [`ForkSafeRuntime::after_fork_parent`] — resumes workers
//! 4. child: [`ForkSafeRuntime::after_fork_child`] — restarts workers on a fresh runtime

Easier to read as a table than a dense list imo, especially once rendered. (IA generated table please double check)

Image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants