controls/cis_debian13: Complete and correct section 1 controls#14806
controls/cis_debian13: Complete and correct section 1 controls#14806israel-villar wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Verified all section 1 controls against CIS Debian Linux 13 Benchmark v1.0.0 PDF and applied the following changes on top of upstream: Corrections to existing controls: - 1.1.1.6: fix title (overlayfs -> overlay) - 1.1.1.7: fix related_rules -> rules - 1.1.2.1.1: fix title (add 'tmpfs or' to partition description) - 1.2.1.2: convert pending to automated (apt_disable_weak_dependencies) - 1.2.1.3-1.2.1.9: convert pending to automated with apt file/dir rules - 1.2.1.4: fix title (add missing '(Automated)' suffix) - 1.3.1.1: fix title (AppArmor packages) - 1.3.1.2: fix title (AppArmor is enabled) - 1.3.1.4: convert pending to automated (apparmor sysctl rule) - 1.5.6: replace disable_prelink with package_prelink_removed - 1.5.7: convert pending to automated (service_apport_disabled) New controls (not yet in upstream): - 1.6.2-1.6.6: banner content and access controls - 1.7.1-1.7.11: GDM/display manager controls Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Hi @israel-villar. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a ComplianceAsCode member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Tip We noticed you've done this a few times! Consider joining the org to skip this step and gain Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Verified all section 1 controls against CIS Debian Linux 13 Benchmark v1.0.0 PDF and applied the following changes on top of upstream:
Corrections to existing controls:
New controls (not yet in upstream):
Description:
Rationale:
Review Hints: