docs: add Common Questions section with GPU resolution guidance and noise seed explanation - #1238
Conversation
…oise seed explanation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 18 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdded a new "Common Questions" FAQ section to the troubleshooting overview documentation across English, Japanese, Korean, and Chinese locales. Each version covers GPU VRAM-based resolution recommendations and explains noise seed behavior for reproducible sampling results. ChangesFAQ Section Addition
No sequence diagram needed here — this is a docs-only change, no seeds of control flow to sow. 🌱 Compact metadata
Suggested labels: documentation, i18n Suggested reviewers: docs maintainers familiar with troubleshooting content Docs got a seedy new FAQ bit, 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
✨ Simplify code
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@ja/troubleshooting/overview.mdx`:
- Line 500: The localized FAQ text is using the wrong parameter name for
KSampler, which can mislead readers; update the sentence in the troubleshooting
overview so that KSampler is referenced with its actual seed parameter name
while keeping noise_seed only for RandomNoise and SamplerCustom. Use the
existing link labels and surrounding troubleshooting wording in the current
paragraph to make the correction consistent with the rest of the documentation.
In `@ko/troubleshooting/overview.mdx`:
- Line 500: The parameter name in this troubleshooting sentence is wrong for
KSampler: it should refer to KSampler’s seed field, not noise_seed. Update the
wording in the overview text so RandomNoise and SamplerCustom keep noise_seed,
while KSampler is described with seed, using the KSampler, RandomNoise, and
SamplerCustom references already present to keep the explanation accurate.
In `@troubleshooting/overview.mdx`:
- Line 488: The parameter reference in the troubleshooting overview is incorrect
for KSampler: it should point to KSampler’s seed field rather than noise_seed.
Update the sentence that mentions RandomNoise, KSampler, and SamplerCustom so
that only RandomNoise and SamplerCustom are associated with noise_seed, while
KSampler is referenced with seed instead.
In `@zh/troubleshooting/overview.mdx`:
- Line 500: The parameter reference is wrong in the troubleshooting text:
KSampler does not use noise_seed, it uses seed. Update the sentence in
overview.mdx so that RandomNoise and SamplerCustom are described as using
noise_seed, while KSampler is referenced with seed, keeping the existing node
links and wording clear for readers.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 22d37386-9739-4dbe-bacc-d77e4b83ad9f
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
ja/troubleshooting/overview.mdxko/troubleshooting/overview.mdxtroubleshooting/overview.mdxzh/troubleshooting/overview.mdx
| - **Comparing parameter changes** — keep the seed fixed and change only one setting to isolate its effect | ||
| - **Batch variation** — change the seed to explore different outputs | ||
|
|
||
| The seed is set in nodes like [RandomNoise](/built-in-nodes/RandomNoise) or in the `noise_seed` parameter of [KSampler](/built-in-nodes/KSampler) and [SamplerCustom](/built-in-nodes/SamplerCustom). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
Fix the KSampler parameter name.
KSampler exposes seed, not noise_seed; only RandomNoise and SamplerCustom use noise_seed. Otherwise this points readers at the wrong setting.
Suggested rewrite
-The seed is set in nodes like [RandomNoise](/built-in-nodes/RandomNoise) or in the `noise_seed` parameter of [KSampler](/built-in-nodes/KSampler) and [SamplerCustom](/built-in-nodes/SamplerCustom).
+The seed is set in nodes like [RandomNoise](/built-in-nodes/RandomNoise) or in the `seed` parameter of [KSampler](/built-in-nodes/KSampler) and the `noise_seed` parameter of [SamplerCustom](/built-in-nodes/SamplerCustom).📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| The seed is set in nodes like [RandomNoise](/built-in-nodes/RandomNoise) or in the `noise_seed` parameter of [KSampler](/built-in-nodes/KSampler) and [SamplerCustom](/built-in-nodes/SamplerCustom). | |
| The seed is set in nodes like [RandomNoise](/built-in-nodes/RandomNoise) or in the `seed` parameter of [KSampler](/built-in-nodes/KSampler) and the `noise_seed` parameter of [SamplerCustom](/built-in-nodes/SamplerCustom). |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@troubleshooting/overview.mdx` at line 488, The parameter reference in the
troubleshooting overview is incorrect for KSampler: it should point to
KSampler’s seed field rather than noise_seed. Update the sentence that mentions
RandomNoise, KSampler, and SamplerCustom so that only RandomNoise and
SamplerCustom are associated with noise_seed, while KSampler is referenced with
seed instead.
…07-08-gpu-resolution-seed-faq
…ashes from Common Questions - Clarify that KSampler uses 'seed', not 'noise_seed' (noise_seed is used by KSamplerAdvanced and SamplerCustom) - Replace em dashes with colons in the three noise seed list items - Revert ja/zh/ko translation file changes (translations are handled by separate pipeline)
1 participant
Summary
Based on Mintlify AI Assistant analytics data (2026-07-04), users frequently ask:
Changes
Source
Mintlify AI Assistant analytics data (2026-07-04)
Checklist