Bias correction#79
Open
micahwoodard wants to merge 16 commits into
Open
Conversation
bruno-f-cruz
requested changes
May 3, 2026
Member
bruno-f-cruz
left a comment
bruno-f-cruz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
From the schema point of view, it looks good. I did not check the business logic, as I am not familiar with the algorithm.
…/block_based_trial_generator.py Co-authored-by: Bruno Cruz <7049351+bruno-f-cruz@users.noreply.github.com>
Collaborator
Author
|
@bruno-f-cruz first pass at integrating the concept of metrics into trial generator and bonsai. Added a GlobalTrialMetrics subject in init and update in sample next trial |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds bias correction to block based trial generator. Algorithm explained in #78. I wrote it so bias overrides autowater but need to follow up w/ scis to make sure this is the desired outcome.
I'm calculating bias synchronously in the next function, but need to benchmark if calculate_bias could ever take longer than the iti period.