Skip to content

OCPSTRAT-3036: Temporarily skip API LBs follow /readyz of kube-apiserver and don't send request early test#31268

Open
jubittajohn wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
jubittajohn:skip-kube-1.36-failing-test
Open

OCPSTRAT-3036: Temporarily skip API LBs follow /readyz of kube-apiserver and don't send request early test#31268
jubittajohn wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
jubittajohn:skip-kube-1.36-failing-test

Conversation

@jubittajohn

@jubittajohn jubittajohn commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The "API LBs follow /readyz of kube-apiserver and don't send request early" test is temporarily skipped while investigating intermittent failures during the 1.36 rebase.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added a test case entry to track and handle a known issue (OCPBUGS-86789) in the APIServer component testing suite.

…end request early test

Signed-off-by: jubittajohn <jujohn@redhat.com>
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jun 8, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jubittajohn: This pull request references OCPSTRAT-3036 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

The "API LBs follow /readyz of kube-apiserver and don't send request early" test is temporarily skipped while investigating intermittent failures during the 1.36 rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 8d8eb871-cb85-4d4a-8332-a7e141e31096

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c0f50ac and 107ea67.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pkg/test/extensions/disabled_tests.go

Walkthrough

A single disabled test entry is added to the "Broken" disablement map in the test extensions configuration, referencing issue OCPBUGS-86789 and disabling a sig-api-machinery APIServer test.

Changes

Test Disablement

Layer / File(s) Summary
Add Broken test disablement
pkg/test/extensions/disabled_tests.go
A new entry with an OCPBUGS-86789 issue reference is added to the "Broken" disabled-tests map, disabling a sig-api-machinery/APIServer/Late feature test.

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15
✅ Passed checks (15 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The pull request title clearly references the specific test being skipped (API LBs follow /readyz of kube-apiserver and don't send request early) and mentions the associated JIRA issue (OCPSTRAT-3036), which directly aligns with the change of adding a disabled test entry.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed Test name added contains only static descriptive strings with no dynamic values, timestamps, generated IDs, or other changing information.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed PR adds test name to disabled_tests.go disablement list, not modifying actual Ginkgo test code. Custom check applies to test implementation quality, not test disablement infrastructure.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR only adds a test name to a disabled tests configuration file; it does not add new Ginkgo e2e tests, so MicroShift compatibility check is not applicable.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed This PR does not add new Ginkgo e2e test definitions. It only adds a test name to a disabled tests filter for an existing upstream test, which is unrelated to SNO compatibility checks.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed PR modifies only a test configuration file listing disabled tests, not deployment manifests, operator code, or controllers with scheduling constraints.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed PR adds a disabled test entry to a data structure within a regular function. No process-level code or stdout writes are present in the modified file.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR only adds a disabled test entry in configuration; no new Ginkgo e2e test definition is added, so IPv6/disconnected network check does not apply.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed PR adds only test metadata entries with no cryptographic implementations, weak crypto algorithms, or unsafe secret comparisons.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed Privileged settings (privileged: true, hostNetwork, runAsUser: 0) in test monitoring manifests are justified for API server disruption testing infrastructure.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed PR adds no logging statements; only adds a test name and issue reference to a disabled tests configuration file.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from deads2k and sjenning June 8, 2026 16:01
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jubittajohn
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign xueqzhan for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the ready-for-human-review Indicates a PR has been reviewed by automated tools and is ready for human review label Jun 8, 2026
@jubittajohn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test images

@jubittajohn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/pipeline required

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@jubittajohn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/verified by ci

Run where test is not disabled

curl -sL "https://storage.googleapis.com/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/31153/pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2/2064028578751713280/artifacts/e2e-aws-ovn-serial/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/junit/junit_e2e__20260608-180132.xml" | grep -i "API LBs follow"
<testcase name="[sig-api-machinery][Feature:APIServer][Late] API LBs follow /readyz of kube-apiserver and stop sending requests [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]" time="0" start-time="2026-06-08T19:17:12Z" end-time="2026-06-08T19:17:12Z" lifecycle="blocking" source-image="tests" source-binary="openshift-tests">
 <testcase name="[sig-api-machinery][Feature:APIServer][Late] API LBs follow /readyz of kube-apiserver and don&#39;t send request early [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]" time="0" start-time="2026-06-08T19:20:04Z" end-time="2026-06-08T19:20:04Z" lifecycle="blocking" source-image="tests" source-binary="openshift-tests">

CI job run from this PR:

curl -sL "https://storage.googleapis.com/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/31268/pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2/2064063069394309120/artifacts/e2e-aws-ovn-serial/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/junit/junit_e2e__20260608-202444.xml" | grep -i "API LBs follow" 
<testcase name="[sig-api-machinery][Feature:APIServer][Late] API LBs follow /readyz of kube-apiserver and stop sending requests [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]" time="0" start-time="2026-06-08T21:45:21Z" end-time="2026-06-08T21:45:21Z" lifecycle="blocking" source-image="tests" source-binary="openshift-tests">

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Jun 8, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jubittajohn: This PR has been marked as verified by ci.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by ci

Run where test is not disabled

curl -sL "https://storage.googleapis.com/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/31153/pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2/2064028578751713280/artifacts/e2e-aws-ovn-serial/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/junit/junit_e2e__20260608-180132.xml" | grep -i "API LBs follow"
<testcase name="[sig-api-machinery][Feature:APIServer][Late] API LBs follow /readyz of kube-apiserver and stop sending requests [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]" time="0" start-time="2026-06-08T19:17:12Z" end-time="2026-06-08T19:17:12Z" lifecycle="blocking" source-image="tests" source-binary="openshift-tests">
<testcase name="[sig-api-machinery][Feature:APIServer][Late] API LBs follow /readyz of kube-apiserver and don&#39;t send request early [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]" time="0" start-time="2026-06-08T19:20:04Z" end-time="2026-06-08T19:20:04Z" lifecycle="blocking" source-image="tests" source-binary="openshift-tests">

CI job run from this PR:

curl -sL "https://storage.googleapis.com/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/31268/pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2/2064063069394309120/artifacts/e2e-aws-ovn-serial/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/junit/junit_e2e__20260608-202444.xml" | grep -i "API LBs follow" 
<testcase name="[sig-api-machinery][Feature:APIServer][Late] API LBs follow /readyz of kube-apiserver and stop sending requests [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]" time="0" start-time="2026-06-08T21:45:21Z" end-time="2026-06-08T21:45:21Z" lifecycle="blocking" source-image="tests" source-binary="openshift-tests">

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jubittajohn: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. ready-for-human-review Indicates a PR has been reviewed by automated tools and is ready for human review verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants