Skip to content

OCPBUGS-87541: Updating openshift-enterprise-tests-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0#31265

Open
openshift-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
openshift-bot:art-consistency-openshift-5.0-openshift-enterprise-tests
Open

OCPBUGS-87541: Updating openshift-enterprise-tests-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0#31265
openshift-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
openshift-bot:art-consistency-openshift-5.0-openshift-enterprise-tests

Conversation

@openshift-bot

@openshift-bot openshift-bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updating openshift-enterprise-tests-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
openshift-enterprise-tests.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
    a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
    canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
    only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
    a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
    canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
  from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out in the #forum-ocp-art Slack channel.

Depends on PullRequest(title="OCPBUGS-87378: Updating ose-tools-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0", number=2283) . Allow it to merge and then run /test all on this PR.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated build infrastructure to support Go 1.26 and OpenShift 5.0 tooling.

@openshift-bot openshift-bot force-pushed the art-consistency-openshift-5.0-openshift-enterprise-tests branch from fd6ab91 to 2f47a73 Compare June 8, 2026 05:24
@openshift-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the ready-for-human-review Indicates a PR has been reviewed by automated tools and is ready for human review label Jun 8, 2026
@openshift-bot openshift-bot changed the title Updating openshift-enterprise-tests-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0 OCPBUGS-87541: Updating openshift-enterprise-tests-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0 Jun 8, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 8, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-87541, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (5.0.0) matches configured target version for branch (5.0.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Updating openshift-enterprise-tests-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
openshift-enterprise-tests.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
    a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
    canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
    only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
    a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
    canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out in the #forum-ocp-art Slack channel.

Depends on PullRequest(title="OCPBUGS-87378: Updating ose-tools-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0", number=2283) . Allow it to merge and then run /test all on this PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

This PR updates the build toolchain configuration to use Go 1.26 and OpenShift 5.0 base images. The CI operator configuration and test Dockerfile are synchronized to reference the new toolchain versions instead of the previous Go 1.25 and OpenShift 4.22 combination.

Changes

Build Toolchain Update

Layer / File(s) Summary
CI operator builder configuration
.ci-operator.yaml
The build_root_image tag is updated from rhel-9-release-golang-1.25-openshift-4.22 to rhel-9-release-golang-1.26-openshift-5.0.
Test image base image updates
images/tests/Dockerfile.rhel
The builder stage and final stage base images are updated to use the newer OpenShift 5.0 images with Go 1.26 toolchain.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15
✅ Passed checks (15 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed PR contains only configuration and Dockerfile changes with no Ginkgo test definitions, so the test name stability check is not applicable.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed This PR modifies CI configuration and Dockerfile instructions, not Ginkgo test code. The custom check is not applicable as it requires reviewing test code that does not exist in the PR changes.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR does not add new Ginkgo e2e tests; it only updates CI build configuration (base image tags for Go 1.26 and OpenShift 5.0). Check is inapplicable.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR contains only infrastructure changes to .ci-operator.yaml and Dockerfile.rhel (image tag updates). No Ginkgo tests have been added, making this SNO compatibility check not applicable.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed PR changes only CI configuration and container build files; no deployment manifests, operator code, or scheduling constraints are introduced.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed PR only modifies CI configuration (.ci-operator.yaml) and Dockerfile base image tags. No Go source code changes; therefore no new OTE Binary Stdout Contract violations introduced.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR only modifies infrastructure configuration (.ci-operator.yaml and Dockerfile.rhel) to update base image tags; no new Ginkgo e2e tests are added, making this check not applicable.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed PR contains only infrastructure changes to image tags in .ci-operator.yaml and Dockerfile.rhel. No weak crypto patterns or implementations found in the codebase.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed PR contains no privileged settings, hostPID/Network/IPC, SYS_ADMIN capabilities, or allowPrivilegeEscalation directives in modified files.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed No logging statements exposing passwords, tokens, API keys, PII, or other sensitive data found in the PR changes. Only image tag updates and harmless configuration changes present.
Title check ✅ Passed The title directly describes the main changes: updating container images for OpenShift 5.0 consistency with ART, which aligns with the .ci-operator.yaml and Dockerfile updates from Go 1.25 to 1.26 and OpenShift 4.22 to 5.0.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from deads2k and sdodson June 8, 2026 05:25
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-bot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign sosiouxme for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-87541, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (5.0.0) matches configured target version for branch (5.0.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
Details

In response to this:

Updating openshift-enterprise-tests-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
openshift-enterprise-tests.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
    a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
    canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
    only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
    a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
    canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out in the #forum-ocp-art Slack channel.

Depends on PullRequest(title="OCPBUGS-87378: Updating ose-tools-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0", number=2283) . Allow it to merge and then run /test all on this PR.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
  • Updated build infrastructure to support Go 1.26 and OpenShift 5.0 tooling.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
images/tests/Dockerfile.rhel (2)

1-24: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical | ⚡ Quick win

Container must run as non-root user.

The Dockerfile violates the container security guideline requiring USER non-root and never running as root. No USER directive is specified, so the container runs as root by default, creating a significant security risk.

Add a USER directive before the final stage's runtime commands to specify a non-root user. As per coding guidelines, Container security (prodsec-skills): USER non-root; never run as root.

🔒 Proposed fix to add non-root USER

Add after line 9 (before the RUN command):

 FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/5.0:tools
 COPY --from=builder /tmp/build/openshift-tests /usr/bin/
+USER 1001
 
 RUN PACKAGES="git gzip util-linux" && \

Note: You may need to adjust file permissions or choose a different UID based on the base image's user configuration. Verify the base image documentation for the appropriate non-root user.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@images/tests/Dockerfile.rhel` around lines 1 - 24, The final runtime stage
currently runs as root because no USER is set; update the Dockerfile to switch
to a non-root user in the final stage (after the COPY --from=builder ...
/usr/bin/ and before the RUN that installs PACKAGES) by adding a USER directive
referencing a non-root account present in the base image (or create one and fix
ownership/permissions of /usr/bin/openshift-tests and any files touched by the
RUN installing PACKAGES), and ensure group/owner and any required dirs are
writable by that user so the subsequent RUN steps succeed.

Sources: Coding guidelines, Linters/SAST tools


8-24: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Add HEALTHCHECK for container monitoring.

The Dockerfile is missing a HEALTHCHECK directive, which violates the container security guideline. Health checks enable orchestrators to monitor container health and restart failed instances.

Add an appropriate HEALTHCHECK directive based on how the openshift-tests binary exposes health status. As per coding guidelines, Container security (prodsec-skills): HEALTHCHECK defined.

💚 Example HEALTHCHECK
 LABEL io.k8s.display-name="OpenShift End-to-End Tests" \
     io.openshift.release.operator=true \
     io.k8s.description="OpenShift is a platform for developing, building, and deploying containerized applications." \
     io.openshift.build.versions="kubernetes-tests=1.35.1" \
     io.openshift.tags="openshift,tests,e2e"
+
+HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=3s \
+  CMD /usr/bin/openshift-tests version || exit 1

Adjust the health check command based on the actual capabilities of the openshift-tests binary.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@images/tests/Dockerfile.rhel` around lines 8 - 24, Add a Docker HEALTHCHECK
directive near the end of the Dockerfile to satisfy the container security
guideline: choose an appropriate probe command that checks the running
openshift-tests binary (e.g., a binary-specific health endpoint or a lightweight
process/port check for "openshift-tests"), and add HEALTHCHECK with sensible
options such as --interval=30s --timeout=5s --start-period=30s --retries=3 so
the container runtime can detect and restart unhealthy containers; update the
Dockerfile block that installs/copies the openshift-tests binary (reference: the
openshift-tests binary copied from builder and the Dockerfile content
surrounding PACKAGES and LABEL entries) and place the HEALTHCHECK directive
before or after the LABEL entries per Dockerfile conventions.

Source: Coding guidelines

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@images/tests/Dockerfile.rhel`:
- Line 3: The Dockerfile.rhel currently uses a broad COPY . . which pulls the
entire build context into the image; replace that with explicit COPY
instructions for only the files needed to build (e.g., COPY go.mod go.sum ./,
COPY Makefile ./, and COPY the source directories used by your build such as
cmd/, pkg/, internal/ or src/), and ensure any build artifacts or sensitive
files are excluded; update the Dockerfile.rhel to sequence copying dependency
files first (go.mod/go.sum), running go mod download (or the equivalent make
target), then copying source directories before running the build so layer
caching remains effective.

---

Outside diff comments:
In `@images/tests/Dockerfile.rhel`:
- Around line 1-24: The final runtime stage currently runs as root because no
USER is set; update the Dockerfile to switch to a non-root user in the final
stage (after the COPY --from=builder ... /usr/bin/ and before the RUN that
installs PACKAGES) by adding a USER directive referencing a non-root account
present in the base image (or create one and fix ownership/permissions of
/usr/bin/openshift-tests and any files touched by the RUN installing PACKAGES),
and ensure group/owner and any required dirs are writable by that user so the
subsequent RUN steps succeed.
- Around line 8-24: Add a Docker HEALTHCHECK directive near the end of the
Dockerfile to satisfy the container security guideline: choose an appropriate
probe command that checks the running openshift-tests binary (e.g., a
binary-specific health endpoint or a lightweight process/port check for
"openshift-tests"), and add HEALTHCHECK with sensible options such as
--interval=30s --timeout=5s --start-period=30s --retries=3 so the container
runtime can detect and restart unhealthy containers; update the Dockerfile block
that installs/copies the openshift-tests binary (reference: the openshift-tests
binary copied from builder and the Dockerfile content surrounding PACKAGES and
LABEL entries) and place the HEALTHCHECK directive before or after the LABEL
entries per Dockerfile conventions.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 41c32db6-9ded-4071-8061-a4da7fa1236a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b1497b7 and 2f47a73.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .ci-operator.yaml
  • images/tests/Dockerfile.rhel

FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/builder:rhel-9-golang-1.25-openshift-4.22 AS builder
FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/builder:rhel-9-golang-1.26-openshift-5.0 AS builder
WORKDIR /go/src/github.com/openshift/origin
COPY . .

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | 🏗️ Heavy lift

Avoid copying entire build context.

Line 3 copies the entire repository context (.) into the image, violating the container security guideline to COPY specific files, not entire context. This increases the image size unnecessarily and potentially includes sensitive files or build artifacts.

Copy only the specific files and directories required for the build (e.g., go.mod, go.sum, source directories). As per coding guidelines, Container security (prodsec-skills): COPY specific files, not entire context.

♻️ Suggested approach

Replace the broad copy with specific paths:

 WORKDIR /go/src/github.com/openshift/origin
-COPY . .
+COPY go.mod go.sum ./
+COPY cmd/ cmd/
+COPY pkg/ pkg/
+COPY vendor/ vendor/
+# Add other specific directories needed for the build

Adjust the specific directories based on what the make command actually requires.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@images/tests/Dockerfile.rhel` at line 3, The Dockerfile.rhel currently uses a
broad COPY . . which pulls the entire build context into the image; replace that
with explicit COPY instructions for only the files needed to build (e.g., COPY
go.mod go.sum ./, COPY Makefile ./, and COPY the source directories used by your
build such as cmd/, pkg/, internal/ or src/), and ensure any build artifacts or
sensitive files are excluded; update the Dockerfile.rhel to sequence copying
dependency files first (go.mod/go.sum), running go mod download (or the
equivalent make target), then copying source directories before running the
build so layer caching remains effective.

Source: Coding guidelines

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@openshift-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ART wants to connect issue OCPBUGS-87790 to this PR, but found it is currently hooked up to ['OCPBUGS-87541']. Please consult with #forum-ocp-art if it is not clear what there is to do.

@neisw

neisw commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openshift-bot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. ready-for-human-review Indicates a PR has been reviewed by automated tools and is ready for human review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants