Add an option for static items and function begining with "__".

I love codedoc,im not a fan of gaint software so codedoc is 102% my favorite documentation generator. The problem is that i want to document "hidden" functions and such. Like i can have the main API in the header files,but also document the support functions in the c files. Can you add an option to document "hidden" functions and such. I am busy writing a compiler otherwise i would do it myself.

Thanks a lot btw,i love your mini-xml library too.

[michaelrsweet]

@nrootconauto I can probably add an option to include "private" declarations (starting with "_" or otherwise tagged with @private@) fairly easily since those are just excluded (but still parsed). Including static definitions would require a third level of scoping (public, private, local) and a little more work I think.

Are you wanting all of the documentation together, or do you want the private/static stuff split out for "internal developer" documentation?

If i was to do it myself,would you merge my changes in. I could also clean-up the C parser a bit

@nrootconauto I can probably add an option to include "private" declarations (starting with "_" or otherwise tagged with @private@) fairly easily since those are just excluded (but still parsed). Including static definitions would require a third level of scoping (public, private, local) and a little more work I think.

Are you wanting all of the documentation together, or do you want the private/static stuff split out for "internal developer" documentation?

Ok,ill do it. Im looking for a "internal developer" documentation type documentation generator. Thankfully the code is mainly in codedoc.c(Cant go wrong with that lol)

(Ill do it at night while i get tired,i have work to do)

[smartmic]

Hi! Having documentation for static definitions is definitely something I am interested in. Is this still under consideration, or, how much effort would it be?

[michaelrsweet]

@smartmic Everything is still under consideration. I haven't had an opportunity to look into this further (been busy with my other projects) but like I said in my initial comments, adding privates to the generated documentation wouldn't been a huge effort, adding static/local stuff would be a greater effort.