thread safe io_buffer

[mipac]

I'd like to use io_buffer from a reader thread and a writer thread
How can I do it safely and efficiently?

[lava]

The only way I see is to mutex the whole buffer, i.e.

// Reader thread
{ std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(io_mutex);
  io_buffer.read(...);
}

// Writer thread
{ std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(io_mutex);
  io_buffer.write(...);
}

Even if you're willing to patch the io_buffer to allow finer-grained locking, I don't really see a good way to implement this. The problem is the resetting of the read/write position when the buffer is completely empty, so both threads really need to be able to change the write position.

Of course, an alternative would be to just use the linear_ringbuffer instead, which supports that use case natively.

[mipac]

ok thank you for reply Le mer. 18 déc. 2019 à 17:47, Benno Evers <notifications@github.com> a écrit :

…

The only way I see is to mutex the whole buffer, i.e. // Reader thread { std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(io_mutex); io_buffer.read(...); } // Writer thread { std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(io_mutex); io_buffer.write(...); } Even if you're willing to patch the io_buffer to allow finer-grained locking, I don't really see a good way to implement this. The problem is the resetting of the read/write position when the buffer is completely empty, so both threads really need to be able to change the write position. Of course, an alternative would be to just use the linear_ringbuffer instead, which supports that use case natively. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABMPSA52YFLOVFICOECP3X3QZJHZZA5CNFSM4J4LVNIKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEHGX7LQ#issuecomment-567115694>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABMPSA5NBKLLMSN5FYFTQYTQZJHZZANCNFSM4J4LVNIA> .