[eval only] Variant B: remove the motivation for OR

Author: kelsey-myers

pkg/github/__toolsnaps__/search_issues.snap

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
         "type": "number"
       },
       "query": {
-        "description": "The search query. Write it as natural language. Avoid boolean OR operators, which fall back to lexical search.",
+        "description": "The search query, as natural language describing the problem. Semantic matching already finds related wording, so synonyms don't need listing or joining with OR.",
         "type": "string"
       },
       "repo": {

pkg/github/__toolsnaps__/search_issues_ff_fields_param.snap

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
         "type": "number"
       },
       "query": {
-        "description": "The search query. Write it as natural language. Avoid boolean OR operators, which fall back to lexical search.",
+        "description": "The search query, as natural language describing the problem. Semantic matching already finds related wording, so synonyms don't need listing or joining with OR.",
         "type": "string"
       },
       "repo": {

pkg/github/issues.go

@@ -1628,7 +1628,7 @@ func searchIssuesTool(t translations.TranslationHelperFunc, includeFields bool)
 		Properties: map[string]*jsonschema.Schema{
 			"query": {
 				Type:        "string",
-				Description: "The search query. Write it as natural language. Avoid boolean OR operators, which fall back to lexical search.",
+				Description: "The search query, as natural language describing the problem. Semantic matching already finds related wording, so synonyms don't need listing or joining with OR.",
 			},
 			"owner": {
 				Type:        "string",