Several places in the tutorial still use jp (absolute jump) where jr (relative jump) would be more appropriate and cycle-efficient. jr is properly explained and introduced in Part I - Jumps, so from that point onward it should be safe to replace jp with jr wherever the target label is within the 128 bytes range.
Work has already started on this (#146), but some occurrences remain.
Several places in the tutorial still use
jp(absolute jump) wherejr(relative jump) would be more appropriate and cycle-efficient. jr is properly explained and introduced in Part I - Jumps, so from that point onward it should be safe to replace jp with jr wherever the target label is within the 128 bytes range.Work has already started on this (#146), but some occurrences remain.