docs: SEO comparison pages — TrapFall vs Sentry, TrapFall vs GlitchTip

[ajianaz]

What

Create SEO-optimized comparison pages: "TrapFall vs Sentry" and "TrapFall vs GlitchTip".

Why

BMAD CMO finding: "sentry alternative" and "glitchtip alternative" are high-intent search queries. These pages capture users actively looking to switch. They are the long-term organic acquisition engine.

Content

TrapFall vs Sentry

• Cost calculator (Sentry pricing vs self-hosted TrapFall = $0)
• Feature comparison table (honest — Sentry has more features, TrapFall has MCP + smaller footprint)
• When to choose Sentry (need cloud, SSO, SOC2, team management)
• When to choose TrapFall (self-hosted, MCP-native, Rust performance, privacy)
• Migration guide link

TrapFall vs GlitchTip

• Architecture comparison (Rust vs Python/Django)
• Docker image size (6MB vs 400MB+)
• MCP tools (12 vs 0)
• Feature parity table
• Performance tracing (TrapFall has it, GlitchTip limited)
• Community (GlitchTip ~2K stars vs TrapFall new — be honest)
• Positioning: "GlitchTip is a great Sentry clone. TrapFall is what comes AFTER Sentry."

Location

VitePress docs site + standalone landing pages for SEO.

Testing

• Pages render correctly
• SEO meta tags present (title, description, og:image)
• Mobile-responsive
• All internal links work