LGPL false positive (should be GPL)

[armijnhemel]

Description

https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/master/scripts/vpkg-provides.sh#L7

has a clear GPL license text, but is recognized as LGPL with exception:

    {
      "path": "rpm/scripts/vpkg-provides.sh",
      "type": "file",
      "detected_license_expression": null,
      "detected_license_expression_spdx": null,
      "license_detections": [],
      "license_clues": [
        {
          "license_expression": "lgpl-2.0-plus WITH ocaml-lgpl-linking-exception",
          "license_expression_spdx": "LGPL-2.0-or-later WITH OCaml-LGPL-linking-exception",
          "from_file": "rpm/scripts/vpkg-provides.sh",
          "start_line": 7,
          "end_line": 7,
          "matcher": "3-seq",
          "score": 46.04,
          "matched_length": 13,
          "match_coverage": 54.17,
          "rule_relevance": 85,
          "rule_identifier": "lgpl-2.0-plus_with_ocaml-lgpl-linking-exception_1.RULE",
          "rule_url": "https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/tree/develop/src/licensedcode/data/rules/lgpl-2.0-plus_with_ocaml-lgpl-linking-exception_1.RULE"
        }
      ],
      "percentage_of_license_text": 0.88,
      "scan_errors": []
    },

I would suggest tightening the rule and adding some required phrases.