[Core] Stop the DSA PR

[mkubdev]

Hello 👋🏻

This repos is taking a wrong direction. Solidity language isn't suited for heavy mathematics computing.

I think we need to remove the list that looks like DSA, and restructure the repos to list Solidity use cases instead.

[sreekar9601]

We should make sub-sections in a way such that it's more useful for implementation,
example: Algos commonly used in DeFi, NFTs, etc.

[Perelyn-sama]

@sreekar9601 great idea

@mkubdev I think continuing won't be a bad idea.
Yeah, solidity is not the best language for DSA but when we attempt to write common algos in it, we learn more about the language.

Also, I think we have to give a thought to writing algos in Yul and Huff since they're more suited for mathematical operations.

@iSumitBanik and @sreekar9601 thanks for your contributions, its nice to not be alone anymore.

[priyda]

Hello 👋🏻

This repos is taking a wrong direction. Solidity language isn't suited for heavy mathematics computing.

I think we need to remove the list that looks like DSA, and restructure the repos to list Solidity use cases instead.

@mkubdev - I would be interested in contributing for non DSA, I am learning solidity by example. Should I add some simple contracts which I am trying for learning the language features?

[mkubdev]

@priyda - sure! :)

[mkubdev]

@mkubdev - I would be interested in contributing for non DSA, I am learning solidity by example. Should I add some simple contracts which I am trying for learning the language features?

How do you think packaging this examples?

[priyda]

@mkubdev - I would be interested in contributing for non DSA, I am learning solidity by example. Should I add some simple contracts which I am trying for learning the language features?

How do you think packaging this examples?

@mkubdev - I have raised a pull request #77, can you please review that once? If looks good. I have more to add for your review :)

[mkubdev]

@mkubdev - I would be interested in contributing for non DSA, I am learning solidity by example. Should I add some simple contracts which I am trying for learning the language features?

How do you think packaging this examples?

@mkubdev - I have raised a pull request #77, can you please review that once? If looks good. I have more to add for your review :)

Sure, i'll review it as soon as i'm available. :D