You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The Illinois partner is still considering the pros and cons of document-first filing, but is comfortable with court selection as the first filing step for the MVP.
Current reorganized main flow is filing-path → upload documents → extraction/review of court and case information. Earlier work (#35 and #75) intentionally moved document upload earlier, so this should be treated as an explicit Illinois MVP product decision rather than an incidental UI tweak.
Proposed Illinois MVP behavior
After choosing Start a new case (and where appropriate File into an existing case), ask the filer to identify the court/venue before requiring document upload.
Partner feedback / product decision
The Illinois partner is still considering the pros and cons of document-first filing, but is comfortable with court selection as the first filing step for the MVP.
Current reorganized
mainflow is filing-path → upload documents → extraction/review of court and case information. Earlier work (#35 and #75) intentionally moved document upload earlier, so this should be treated as an explicit Illinois MVP product decision rather than an incidental UI tweak.Proposed Illinois MVP behavior
Related issues