Introduced in #1387, I've found that this parameter only really works as intended over a less than 2-orders of magnitude range:
- too small and it has not impact
- too big and candidate assets cannot meet the demand
If this is reliable, then maybe that's ok, but I've only tested this with the limited example models in the repo. I also haven't investigate the relationship with the related candidate_asset_capacity parameter. I imagine the relative value of this is important, so it may be better to define the epsilon parameter relative to this, or just hardcode them both.
I also suggested an alternative idea here, which would avoid having to do the dispatch with candidates all together.
Introduced in #1387, I've found that this parameter only really works as intended over a less than 2-orders of magnitude range:
If this is reliable, then maybe that's ok, but I've only tested this with the limited example models in the repo. I also haven't investigate the relationship with the related
candidate_asset_capacityparameter. I imagine the relative value of this is important, so it may be better to define the epsilon parameter relative to this, or just hardcode them both.I also suggested an alternative idea here, which would avoid having to do the dispatch with candidates all together.